My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-23-2010
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
08-23-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2013 1:49:19 PM
Creation date
10/1/2010 9:36:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council August 23, 2010 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />Dan Mueller, 8343 Groveland Road, stated he was not in favor of extra fees or taxes, but felt this <br />franchise fee did assist the City by creating better roads along with funding additional police and <br />fire department needs. He hoped the Council would support the franchise fee and not fear the <br />loss of votes, because it was an election year. <br />Hearing no further public input, Mayor Flaherty closed the public hearing at 7:19 p.m. <br />Mayor Flaherty questioned how the franchise fees were distributed in the City's funds. Finance <br />Director Beer stated 50% went into the street improvement fund and 50% went into the general <br />fund. He indicated the percentage increase would generate an additional $4,900 for each fund. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Gunn. To approve the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance <br />849, Implementing a Franchise Fee on Center Point Energy Natural Gas Operations within the <br />City of Mounds View, viewing the pending, and that a summary Ordinance be published. <br />MOTION AMENDMENT: Hull/Flaherty. To Reduce the Franchise Fee from 3.87% to 3.75%. <br />Council Member Mueller stated she was not in favor of the amendment to her motion. <br />Council Member Hull stated he has been consistent in voting against increased franchise fees. <br />He had concerns with this type of taxation and would like the fee to be reduced. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that by lowering the franchise fee, the City would need to <br />increase taxes on to the residents. He stated the City would then need to potentially raise the <br />levy. He felt it did not make sense to reduce the franchise fee. <br />Council Member Mueller understood that franchise fees affected every structure that uses energy <br />in the City; however, this was based on consumption. She indicated this was a fair and equitable <br />fee. <br />Mayor Flaherty stated fees were a form of taxation and was originally instituted to help the City <br />in tough financial times. However, it was to sunset and be phased out. He indicated the original <br />intent of the fee from 1992 has been lost. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated the Council had to address the needs of the City at this time <br />and the franchise fee was assisting the City financially at this time, especially with the large TIF <br />districts. He felt it would be foolishness to change the fee at this time. <br />Council Member Gunn explained the Council had no idea what the economy would do from <br />1992 to 2010, or that LGA would be cut. She was in favor of keeping the franchise fee and <br />reviewing the need for it on a yearly basis. <br />Mayor Flaherty commented the government continues to add fees that get absorbed into budgets <br />and are not able to ever be resolved. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.