Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 23, 2010 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br />fee to assist the City financially. He requested the Council focus less on the previous suggestion <br />to sunset the fee and instead use the franchise fee to eliminate the need to increase property taxes. <br />Gary Quick, 8330 Knollwood Drive, explained he was on the Council when the franchise fee was <br />installed and increased. The fee assisted the City through tough financial times and had a sunset <br />clause to allow the Council to review the fee. <br />Hearing no further public input, Mayor Flaherty closed the public hearing at 7:42 p.m. <br />Mayor Flaherty commented the franchise fee has been in place for 18 years and stated the <br />original intent was to create a revenue source but was not intended to be long term. He agreed <br />the City needed additional revenue sources, and should perhaps look at other sources. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Mueller. To approve the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance <br />850, Implementing a Franchise Fee on Xcel Energy Electric and Natural Gas Operations within <br />the City of Mounds View, waive the reading, and that a suminary Ordinance be published, <br />amending the franchise increase to 3.95%. <br />Council Member Stigney again reiterated the fact that the franchise fee increase would assist the <br />City with the budget by increasing revenues and making the levy increase more manageable. <br />Council Member Hull requested a motion amendment to reduce the franchise fee to 3.75%. He <br />stated this was based on the same rationale as previously stated. <br />MOTION AMENDMENT: Hull/Flaherty. To Reduce the Franchise Fee to 3.75%. <br />Council Member Mueller stated the fee would greater benefit the City if not reduced. She <br />explained if the franchise fees were reduced, properly taxes would have to be increased. <br />Council Member Hull further reviewed the numbers on the franchise fee and felt people should <br />be impacted based on income and not with just a flat fee. <br />Council Member Stigney suggested the Council not reduce the franchise fee as taxes would then <br />need to be increased. He indicated there was a direct correlation between the two. Now was not <br />the time to reduce the rate, and that this should not be considered until the TIF districts end. <br />Mayor Flaherly indicated he did not feel the fee would ever go away and that this was not the <br />original intent. <br />Council Member Mueller stated as the TIF districts expire the City's revenue streams would <br />begin to increase. Now was not the time to reduce or alter the franchise fee. <br />AMENDMENT VOTE: <br />Ayes — 2 Nays — 3(Stigney, Mueller, Gunn) Motion failed. <br />