|
a B. J. ,'ar •rte•,: en
<br />d.,
<br />asses, ,a1 sewer lei' wa1.. W.1.
<br />pr,dert3- 1,..411.01d nut !ILIAC! been
<br />Present Assessment
<br />C,:r,•ected issessw.
<br />A ..:CS• ,11+, ,1'
<br />L 1, Ill..• :f, 2, Greeulleld
<br />81,11.z,... has an .••we e4 e.+ I.;1 :1 ,.emu
<br />Li,... LUII.Ci+, of his let. '11i... u1 L,:.
<br />nl.tce the assessable footage Lo the .or o•.I 11 it
<br />1::::.12 i.t•u.+L feet to 2119.55' es,.iudinl, L.+e L. .1.+' fur str..o..
<br />Prudent A:•,ossmeht 1•L
<br />Revised Assessment n i•i.
<br />The sanitary sewer t i n e was u :stcnond d L ......1 L•3er's aau
<br />Mr. Mecko l l s request to serve these t u t s
<br />G. Mr. Lean C. I•.ru„h ,0,0, 221 ul
<br />S 1/2 ui Lot 122 8l,i•L11;;• La,.e P:.rl: iI±11•.'.� w
<br />Ha` a unit and Sewer service-was u•.,C 1oL' Ca,:+•,.
<br />Auu $220.00 to assessment.
<br />Present oossment r?:•.•i
<br />Re. ised Assessment :1
<br />•7. Newt•;,, .14!o 010 as
<br />N. 1.,.,,7', LoL „ri And. 3uu. 6u, a!;
<br />Mr. Newton donated laud for a data; to t '1'iage and waI
<br />erruneous1y assessed for village owned Lund.
<br />Present Assessment �•2+
<br />Revised Assessment 1,102.96
<br />B. Diner n, 7 010 100 U0
<br />Lot. 10 Spring Lake Park Knolls Addition
<br />Mr. Baker would prefer to be serviced from Bronson Drive
<br />on the C -i -C -3 Dist. rather than from Silver Luke Road.
<br />Re is at the N.W. cor. of S.L. Red. Urdusnn and wants
<br />his sewer piping on the W side of 1115 house.
<br />Present Assessment 1,569...e
<br />Revised Assessment 797.02
<br />(Area only)
<br />9. 13. Auoott ad 0.110 010 09
<br />Lot 9, And. Sub. Nu. n:i
<br />T++. re win. an error in figurine the are assessment of $2
<br />Present Assessment 2,902.13
<br />Revised Assessment 2,890.77
<br />10. A. P. Chris11aasoll id :U70 521 01
<br />N. 132.5' of Lot 52 Spring Lal ;c Pari: lli t t iew
<br />A unit and service were omitted on this assessment
<br />And $220.00
<br />11. R. •I.+Lls 59 7070 70i 00
<br />1/2 Lot 76 Spring Lake Part: Hillview
<br />Pas unit and service wasn't assessed i..r tam'.
<br />Present ,ssessment e7d.45
<br />Corrected Assessment 1,udr. 5
<br />The 11011 a fur the adoption of the furel;olnq reso+ „Lion was dui
<br />seconded by Member j and upon a vuLe bei.1g taLen, the folluwinl:
<br />members voted In favor thereof:
<br />and the following members voted against the same:
<br />1..:-:1 4150
<br />.11 .•u
<br />'it .01
<br />
|