My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 0391
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
00001 - 00499 (1958-1970)
>
Resolution 0391
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2019 10:11:38 AM
Creation date
10/15/2010 4:11:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
Resolutions
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Dennis Zylla, Deputy Clerk <br />Village of Mounds View <br />2401 Highway 10 <br />New Brighton, Minnesota 55112 <br />Dennis, <br />RM:mh <br />cc: Dorothy Brandl <br />Don Drung <br />Resolution No. 391 <br />COMSTOCK DAVIS, INC. <br />11N COUNTY ROAD YJ" <br />MINNEAPOLIS NINN IOTA 00433 <br />TELL SU Mt 4.MM <br />CONSULTING ENGINEERS <br />July 15, 1968 <br />Re: Resolution No. 385 <br />Division No. 38898 <br />The Council approved Division No. 38898 on July 8, 1968, with Resolution No. <br />385. A special assessment was levied against the N 150' of Mr. Drung's lot <br />which was sold to the Messiah Evangelical Luthern Church and a check for $1,412.79 <br />made out to the Village; another check for $415.25 was given to the Village to <br />pay .7415.25 on D.P. 56. <br />Mr. Drung sold the N 150' of Lot 75, Spring Lake Park Knolls. A typographical <br />error shows it to be the N 250' throughout our letter and division of the 3rd <br />of this month. Please correct this on your copies. <br />Also, the apportionment for D.P. 56 is not correct as it stands in format. <br />Our letter of May 28, 1968, shows that pro rating was used to determine the <br />$415.25 to be paid on D.P. 56. On the Division of the 8th, this pro rating <br />was omitted. The total of the payment due, on the division for parcel <br />59- 7090 752 -00, should be $444.90, which when adjusted at the Auditor's office <br />becomes $415.25, the amount of the check on hand. When I finalized the <br />division of the 8th I did not take this pro rating into account. <br />A new Resolution of the Council is required amending Resolution No. 385 and <br />replacing the apportionment of the 8th with the apportionment enclosed, which <br />also correctly states the division to be the N 150'. <br />The County Auditor's office has assigned a rush priority to this Division, so <br />again I'll request you to try and get this amendment resolution passed at tonight's <br />agenda meeting. Mr. Drung is anxious to have this matter finally resolved. <br />Thank you, <br />COMSTOCK DAVIS, INC. <br />By <br />R. Mu y <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.