Laserfiche WebLink
PROCEEDINO3 OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL <br />VILLAGE or MOUNDS VIEW <br />RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br />The regular :vgating of .the Mounds Viow.:Village Council ^•waa• <br />o0104 to order by Mayor Crane at 8:00 P.D. June 26th, 1961 at <br />the Mod Oak School, Sherwood Rd. and Red Oak Dr., Minneapolis, <br />RS*SOta. <br />Present were: <br />Mayor: Allan D. Crane <br />Clerk: Lloyd J. Blanchard <br />Administrative <br />Clerk: Paul Boog <br />Trustees: Melford Christensen <br />Perry Malvin <br />Donald Hodges <br />Attorney: Richard Meyers <br />Engineer: Les Knutson <br />Public Works Supt: Walter Skiba <br />000076 <br />Motion by Hodges to approve minutes of June 12th meeting <br />as presented. Seconded by Malvin. 5 Ayes for approval. <br />Motion by Blanchard to accept the low bid for the water <br />filtration plant from D.'1. Hicke'y Company in the amount of <br />$44,660,00. Seconded by Hodges. The Council, Engineer, and <br />Attorney discussed at great lengths the pros and cons of the <br />motion. The "opinion of the t•!o w 't id- cr: r_..id citizen's were <br />preOented. The Engineers explained their views as follows: <br />Mechanical Equipment Mounds View Water Filtration Plant <br />Regarding the bide for the above mentioned project, we deem it <br />advisable to inform the council of certain facts concerning the <br />equipment as bid by the low bidder, Turb?matic Co., D.W. Hicke Co. <br />equipment, •and that of the second biddethe Layne- Minnesota Co., <br />.General Filter Corp. equipment. The bid of the Turbomatic Co. <br />was in`the amount of $44,660 for'equipment which was an alternate <br />to-that proposed in the base bid.'. This equipment cannot be con <br />strued to be comparable to that of the base bid due to the follow- <br />ing features: <br />1. The piping arrangement of the raw water line is such that the <br />flow to the individual cells cannot be separately controlled. <br />The raw water line itself within the tank is calibrated for a <br />1,000 gallon per minute flow. Should the rate of flow be in- <br />creased to 1,200 gal. or reduced to 000 gal. per minute, this <br />calibration would not equally distribute the water to the res- <br />pective individual cells. <br />2. The under drain systea is connected in the manner which makes it <br />mandatory to back wash the entire unit rather than by an individual <br />cell basis as proposed in the base bid. Should it be necessary to <br />back wah the unit with filtered the additional cost over <br />a 25 year period will approach ?9,000. in power alone. <br />