Laserfiche WebLink
-2- <br />The Mayor asked if there were any objections to the <br />rezonira and there were none. OJ0100 <br />Mx. Harris stated that he could see no drainage <br />problem in this proposal. <br />Motion by Crane to concur with the Planning Commission's <br />recommend and rezone the North 100 feet of the South <br />185 feet of Lot 53, Auditor's Subdivision No. 89, Ramsey <br />County, Minnesota from R1 -A to R3., instructing the building <br />inspector to withold the building permit until the Village <br />Engineer has approved the drainage and the Village Attorney <br />has completed the ammendment necessary to the coning ordinance. <br />Seconded by Malvin. 4 Ayes. Sullivan abstained because <br />he arrived to late to get fuel information on the motion. <br />The Mayor declared the hearing closed. <br />A letter from Mr. A. Jansen 3511 Hilltop Street, White <br />Bear Lake, was received and read by the Clerk. Mr. Jansen <br />requested a lowering of his water assessment. He was <br />informed that the time for the request had elapsed and the <br />Council had taken the stand against any re- assessing. <br />Mr. Andrew Trelstad, 7761 Eastwood Drive, requested <br />the Village tb ease the water problem in his area. The <br />Engineer informed him that although a ditch on either <br />side of the road would keep the water from the street off <br />his property, the only final solution would be a storm <br />sewer project. <br />At 9:00 P.M. the Mayor opened the Public Hearing on <br />Water Improvement Project 1962 -3,. <br />The Engineer explained the project and gave estimated <br />costs as follows: <br />Estimated total project price including service <br />Connections $45,000.00 <br />Estimated Front footage assessment $4.76 per foot. <br />Estimated service connection charge $120.00 per connection <br />The Engineer then explained that because of expected <br />"wet" construction the cost of the project was figured <br />somewhat higher than other recent projects. <br />The Mayor asked for objections to the project and they <br />were as follows: <br />1. Mr. Ray Faricy, Attorney for Don Voge Highway #8 <br />and County Road J. Reason will not use and does not <br />need the water. Feels that the line will serve no purpose <br />abutting his property. <br />2. George Jackson, 8300 Highway #8, objected for the <br />same reason. <br />The Engineer explained that to make the system as free <br />from "dead end" lines as possible the system should be looped <br />and this loop represents the lines abutting the properties <br />of Mr. Voge and Mr. Jackson. <br />The Mayor asked for proponents of the project and they <br />were as follows: <br />Mrs. James Fedorko 5237 Edgewood Drive <br />Mr. Jack Morgan 8241 Edgewood and Mr. Tollefson <br />whc own several lots in the project area. <br />