Laserfiche WebLink
Robert H. I- iillyard <br />2166 Hwy #10 <br />Contamination of area was stated to be 51 Never met <br />anyone in last four years in that 51% bracket. Thinks <br />it would be cheaper for Village to pay for replacing <br />septic tanks for those who need them rather than putting <br />in whole system. <br />Warren Johnaon <br />2250 Oakwood Dr. <br />Doesn't understand why we have to take it. Shouldn't <br />Council ask for vote on it rather than force us tc <br />take it? <br />Arlene Stowasser <br />7846 Long Lake Road <br />Took water --doesn't need it -did so to help ethers. <br />Now living next door to 2 empty houses. Don't need <br />sewer at this time. <br />Wm. Kelner <br />7850 Greenwood <br />Big lots cannot split. Assessment too large. Why not <br />a flat rate for a house? <br />Henry Dyslin <br />5092 Brighton Lane <br />Not feasible -cost too great. <br />The following verbally FAVORED the proposal: <br />Mrs. George Beckwith <br />2466 Clearview <br />Sewers overflowed in area creating disagreeable conditions. <br />Need lower taxes -sewer wilibring in ether to area. Improves <br />property for resale. <br />Tom Sherman <br />2299 Hillview Road <br />Wants to live in a progressive community. <br />Donald Hodges <br />5086 Eastwood Rd. <br />Wants sewer. Does nut like unsanitary cc:nditicns caused <br />by sewer backup. If project does not go through, will be <br />forced tc move back to city. <br />Mrs. Peterson <br />2277 Knoll Drive <br />Likes sewer. D-)es nct like ccnditicns created by faulty <br />septic tank. <br />