Laserfiche WebLink
and the cost figures are good through the year 1966. <br />Mr. Meyers made several more comments on questions which <br />came up at previous hearings such as, "Why is this matter <br />(sewer proposal) not put to election He explained, as in <br />previous hearings, that State law now placed the responsibility <br />with the Village Council for making the decision whether or not <br />to go ahead with this project. The law requires certain hearings <br />be held. The hearings are for explanation and airing objections. <br />Written objections are also acceptable and will be recorded. <br />He explained that verbal statements would be taken later in <br />the meeting and those not wishing to express themselves orally <br />would have the opportunity of signing their names to sheets <br />designated "For" or "Against" the proposal. <br />He explained the matter of easement requirements-- approxi- <br />mately 100 are needed to complete the system. Appointments were <br />scheduled at previously appointed times for those wishing to <br />confer with the Village Attorney on the matter. Some persons <br />have donated them, which is very helpful since the Village does <br />not have a budget for the acquisition of easements at this time. <br />They have tried to conform easements with future road plans and <br />future needs of the Village. <br />In reply to the questions asking how this improvement <br />will be paid for and when will assessments begin, he stated <br />if the Council approves the project, the assessment hearings <br />-10- <br />