Minutes - 1973/10/09 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-2- in the Anchor Inn property to order at 8:36 P.M. Council waived reading of the legal notice. Clerk Zylla noted that the notice was published in the New Brighton Bulletin on September 27 and October 4, 1973. There were no objections from the floor. MSP Neisen- Johnson) To approve the vacation of the following easements contingent on receipt of the new easement and the installation of the drainage pipe in the new easement and that the installation be performed at the expense of the developer. Parcel 060 -52, being the North 231 feet of the West 330 feet of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 8, Township 30, Range 23, in the Village of Mounds View, Ramsey County, Minnesota; subject to roads and a drainage easement over the South 5 feet, and Parcel 030 -52, the South 132 feet of the North 363 feet of the West 330 feet of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 8, Township 30, Range 23, in the Village of Mounds View, Ramsey County, Minnesota; subject to roads and a drainage easement over the North 5 feet. In exchange for the vacation, the Village will receive a 10' perpetual easement for storm sewer purposes over, under, and across the following described property: The South 132 feet of the North 363 feet of the West 330 feet of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 8, Township 30, Range 23, in the Village of Mounds View, Ramsey County, Minnesota, except therefrom the East 30 feet and also the West 30 feet. MSP (Hodges Pickar) To adjourn the special hearing at 8:40 P.M. 5 Ayes Mayor Neisen called the special hearing to consider the drainage problem between Sherwood Road and Laport Drive West of Jackson Drive to order at 8:40 P.M. Clerk Zylla read the legal notice and attested to its publication in the New Brighton Bulletin on September 22 and October 4, 1973. 17 notices were sent. Engineer Cor:.Jtock summarized the improvement noting that drainage in the past was by perculation, but increased runoff and development has caused a drainage problem. The area is impracticable to fill. He suggested installing approximately 300 feet of 12 inch conduit at an approximate cost of $2,100.00. (Project 1973 -6) Peter Wiedemann, 2333 Sherwood Road, agreed there was a problem but opposed the improvement because there was no direct or indirect benefit to him. Bruce Lawson, 2332 Laport Drive, reiterated that there was no benefit and the improvement was unjustified and ridiculous even though his water may contribute to the drainage problem. Attorney Meyers gave an explanation of benefits noting that benefit may accrue even though one's property doesn't abut the improvement.