My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1976/01/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1976
>
Minutes - 1976/01/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2025 1:47:16 PM
Creation date
2/7/2011 2:24:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
1/26/1976
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Memorandum and Argument to City Council <br />City of Mounds View <br />Ramsey Count, Minnesota <br />January 26, 1976 <br />From; <br />John G. Bell <br />Attorney at Law <br />In behalf of the Anchor luau, Donatelle's, Launching Pad, <br />and Mermaid, Liquor Establishments in the City of <br />Mounds View. <br />Re: On sale liquor and caberet licenses. <br />Gentlemen: <br />There is no questions but the licensing of certain businesses in a municipality is an <br />exercise of the police power which has been delegated to municipalities by the legislature. <br />The poverto license, however, is not a power to tax. The service for which a City <br />may be reimbursed by a license fee must be reasonably related to the police power function <br />of inspection, supervision, and regulation. While there is no question that the municipali <br />has within its authority to set a fee for a license, a reasonable license fee should be <br />charged and should be such as to cover the expense of issuing the license and the services <br />and other expenses directly or indirectly arising out of the issuance of the license. Th <br />amount of the license fees should be limited to the cost of issuing the license and the <br />probable expense of police supervision of those engaged in the business to be licensed. A <br />charge or fee to defray the cost of a police power regulation need not be so restricted <br />in amount so as to eliminate a reasonable revenue, incidental to the issuance of the license <br />However, the revenue aspect of a license fee should be incidental and the issuance of <br />a license should not be for the purpose of raising revenue, for then it becomes a tax. <br />While there is a presumption that in exacting a license fee, a lawfull purpose was intended <br />by the municipality, a license fee may so far exceed the reasonable expenses incurred for <br />police power purposes as to be a revenue measure in disguise, and therefore invalid. <br />There has been no showing that on sale liquor establishments or caberet establishments <br />in the City of Mounds View have by their operations increased the costs for the City of <br />Mounds View in regulating their establishments in any way other than general increase in <br />costs for all government services. One might expect that on sale liquor or caberet <br />establishments would require a more extensive use of the police department than some <br />other regulated businesses, but the fact is that the records of the Mounds View Police <br />Department reveal that the Mounds View Square Shopping Center has had a greater need <br />for police department services than the liquor or caberet establishments. Information obtained <br />by my clients would indicate that out of a total of 2,836 police runs in 1975 only 120 were <br />to the liquor and caberet establishn_..:n +.Q amounting to 4% of the total. The minutes of <br />the December 8, 1975 Mounds View City Council Meeting, in the course of discussing the <br />City's current financial crunch, would blame inflation, state surplus funds as not being <br />shared with municipalities, and a 18% increase in police salaries. Such a find does not singl <br />out as the culprit in increase City costs the liquor business, the caberet business, or for <br />that matter the restaurants. <br />Liquor and caberet and resturant establishments as well as other businesses are entitled to <br />municipal services since they pay a real estate tax. In the absence of showing a need for <br />a regulation of an industry to protect the public health, safety, and welfare and morals, no <br />license fee at all is justified. While licensing is a function of the City and the exercise <br />of the police power, license fees should be commensurate with the cost involved in the <br />licensing, and fees substantially in excess are actually a tax. It would thus appear that the <br />City is attempting to use licensing as a device to raise revenue which is properly to be raised <br />by ;axes, The Council has a duty to exercise limitations on its licensing power lest the <br />;Am er be used as a power that could destroy a business. Taxes are spread out, licenses single <br />.)U 1)11LiCUlar group. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.