Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />.1anupr.“ lm, 1^77 <br />At 2:`S p.h called to order <br />'toe nnmestead A'Odition nreliminar plat. <br />in 7 <br />Administrator ^chen revier!ed the Ororos °d resolution on this ntter. <br />(naum!7artner- "o -'nes) for the adoetion of 'ssnlution 7n7, "Requesting <br />the MN Dept. of Transportation to construct noise barriers along Inter- <br />state 35W in the City of Mounds View." <br />Roll call vote: Councilmember Hodges, aye <br />Councilmember Rowley, aye <br />Mayor Pickar, nay <br />Councilmember Baumgartner, aye <br />Councilmember Ziebarth, nay <br />Motion passed. <br />the public h-aring on t!ie <br />!Administrator Achen exrlained that in order to avoid having a major <br />freeNav access at :led flak Drive, the Planning commission has refused <br />to accept any additional easements along ^edy' ak Drive. The County <br />';'ants an additional eight foot ease;:zant before they rri 11 allow the <br />plat to be filed. The Planning Commission has recommended approval <br />of this preliminary plat i 'ith the condition that drainage and utility <br />easements he provided. <br />'.eRoy !'eyerson, 2m^ i Yawel1 Street, asked '''hat the restrictions were <br />on a drainage easement. Administrator ",Chen stated that any improvements <br />_that are male on an easement could hp removed by the City to na'-:e a <br />utility drainage. It is a City policy to get easements !.,'Sere ever <br />?ossihle .iust in case a problem arises. !"ngin_er Hubbard stat.-J <br />that the set backs are still measured from the lot lines. <br />Administrator Achan stated that the county has ta'cn the position <br />that they will not even negotiate. The County +ri 11 not build a four <br />lane road on a Ss foot ri g'ht of rra,' they require this right of <br />Nay because the State lay sa they should. The Cite !!.ttorney has <br />looked into this matter and feels that the County is probably right <br />in doing this. T'he county "rill reuse to record the plat unless <br />there is a ';r., foot right of !'ay. <br />Attorney leyers state that the county a %_as!: the Ci t to ,'at the <br />right of Nays for r'ed n.a'• ^rive instead of !.wing assessed for the <br />1!'.17ro:' rent. IMP question is if the cit;.' is l'lll i"1^ to an this and <br />i f so, r¢1en to start getting t'' right o' "a y <br />Councilnem!'er "aungartner re,ier;rd a "at t co rehensive plan Safs <br />about r na °rive. <br />Sanr'ra "everson stated that the 'role idea seems to '2 protecting <br />the eeoel e On ^anti "Z!' !1ri v 'rrom an arterial !11' "'a`', r S'10 asked f <br />the i t" Could ta''e over Mee Sri ve. <br />Administrator rr:!1r?n exnlain?' that the '!1 ''a' ceeartm nt's colic'' <br />on these interchann?s iS to ''or' "i the local jirisdictions as much <br />as 7OSSib10 and tr" to resolve an» nro' Cm's. Tf the `'oult' w'is the <br />road and the inerc'1nnrt goes in, the 1 ''av' to !:are the costs to <br />lr rove t' real. 1" the Nt. n e th i e interchange <br />in t! i` n ,�.e,lr! t tl <br />'t. does <br />to sit- C• t 1, ftre 'he costs es im.groving r' d ma' "rive <br />an l an" traffic liggalc at se'1nt" t t r- vi'..rer, the nro7ose <br />