My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1977/06/20
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1977
>
Minutes - 1977/06/20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2025 1:46:33 PM
Creation date
2/7/2011 2:25:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
6/20/1977
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-3- <br />Arnold Knapp, 5210 Greenfield Avenue stated that he wanted to park his recreational <br />vehicle at his own home and stated that a property owner should be able to do what <br />he pleases on his own property. <br />Mayor Pickar replied that he agreed, that the City had a democratic system and that <br />the problem had to be worked out to the peoples satisfaction. <br />Bill Kirberger of New Brighton introduced himself as a state legislative representative <br />of the Good Sam Camping Organization, which has 3,200 members and stated that he was <br />concerned about the ordinance and had received complaints from citizens of Mounds View, <br />which was why he was present at the meeting. <br />He stated that he did not believe the City officials had the right to put the ordi- <br />nance into effect, that it was unconstitutional and should not be put into effect <br />because of a neighbor who did not like the view. He also asked what the City expected <br />to gain by the ordinance. <br />He stated that a town in Texas had been faced with the same problem and their City <br />Council decided to build a recreational vehicle park, at a cost of $139,000 and they <br />ended up making a considerable amount of money on it. <br />Councilmember Ziebarth replied that to answer the question of what the City expected <br />to accomplish by the ordinance, was that safety factors be established and enforced, <br />such as parking a recreational vehicle on an incline close to the street. <br />Mr. Kirberger stated that he agreed that there should be safety factors enforced. He <br />asked that the City Attorney contact the State Attorney General regarding the con- <br />stitutionality of the ordinance. <br />Ann Ross, 5142 Eastwood Road stated that she knew where there were several junk cars <br />parked in the city and wondered why just recreational vehicles were being pursued <br />and not junk cars also. Mrs. Ross asked if any action had been taken yet on the <br />flyer the City sent out on recreational vehicles. <br />Mayor Pickar gave the background of the flyer for those who were not aware of it. <br />It was included in the March 1977 Newsletter and was a questionnaire on recreational <br />vehicle parking. A total of 132 questionnaires were returned. These included 23 <br />photocopied questionnaires that one resident went house -to -house asking citizens to <br />complete. <br />Of 132 2s 92 came from 'ia?�^t; r vehicles. O these <br />the JL responses, JL I; it i ll�',iLYI. recreational 1 Il�l.i yr <br />92 recreational vehicle owners, 60 (66 indicated they ALWAYS park these vehicles <br />in the front or side yard, and 9 indicated they NEVER park in the front or side yard. <br />The balance parked in the front yar nr f 1 s <br />0 -5 days 3 <br />5 -25 days 6 <br />25 -50 days 6 <br />over 50 days 3 <br />summer only 10 <br />Of the 92 owners of recreational vehicles. 80 (873x) do not store the vehicle off <br />their premises in the winter. 63 (68'x) do not use the vehicle for daily transportation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.