My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1977/08/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1977
>
Minutes - 1977/08/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2025 1:46:33 PM
Creation date
2/7/2011 2:25:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
8/22/1977
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
August 22, 1977 Page 10 <br />MSP (Pickar- Baumgartner) to continue the public hearing for the O'Neil commercial <br />and residential development at 7:45 PM on StTtemher 12, 197/and that the Staff <br />be directed to contact Short, Elliot, Hendrickson and Associates and have them <br />apply themselves specifically to the questions of the development and how it affects <br />the surrounding territory as to water table drainage. 5 ayes <br />MSP (Ziebarth- Hodges) to amend the previous motion to include information on the <br />Scotland Green development as to the water table before and after the addition <br />was put in and to get an idea of what the agreement would look like to insure the <br />City that the parking lot would be put in. 5 ayes <br />Bob Glazer asked what general conclusion was drawn from the environmental impact <br />study that had been done. Mayor Pickar replied that it was not disfavorable as <br />far as the City was concerned. Councilmember Baumgartner asked that Mayor Pickar's <br />statement become part of the record. <br />Mayor Pickar reminded the citizens that no further notice would be given as to the <br />continuance of the public hearing to September 12 at 7:45 PM. He then recessed the <br />hearing and opened the public hearing on the Northcrest Park development. <br />NORTHCREST PARK INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOP- <br />MENTGENERAL CONCEPT PLAN <br />Bill Beim of Pinecrest Properties stated that it was very difficult to define a P.U.D. <br />(Planned Unit Development) and that this was both his and the City's first experience <br />with one. The area to be developed would include apartments, office /warehouse, office, <br />motel office, retail commercial and restaurants commercial. <br />Aslanidis stated the Comprehensive Plan suggested a P.U.D., with a mixture of <br />uses and provides a tool to work with. Mr. Aslanidis stated that a median cut on <br />Highway 10 between County Road H and County Road H2 would minimize the traffic that <br />would exit onto H2. He also stated that the planned curb cuts on H2 had been cut to <br />four from eight, at the request of the Planning Commission. <br />They have checked the drainage plan witn Short,Elliot, Hendrickson and Associates. <br />The drainage pond is proposed to collect water from the area,onthe south side and <br />a smaller holding pond might be developed on the east side. They will have a better <br />idea once Rice Creek has approved the plan. <br />Mayor Pickar stated that the plan is up for approval of the concept and that a public <br />hearing would be held again and that the Council is just to act upon the concept tonight. <br />Lucille Miller, 5287 Raymord asked how many apartment buildings would be put up on H2. <br />Mr. Aslanidis replied a tota: of 129 units were planned, and they were not certain <br />yet how many buildings that would involve. <br />Mrs. Miller asked if the City had not at one time said there would be no more apart- <br />ment buildings allowed in Mounds View. Mayor Pickar replied that yes, the City had <br />said they would not rezone any more property. However, the property in question is <br />already zoned for apartments. <br />Mrs. Miller asked if duplexes could be built instead. 1r. Aslanidis replied that duplexes <br />were a possibility but that it all depended upon the market requirements in the future <br />and that apartments were planned. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.