My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Council_Minutes_1980_10_14
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
Council Minutes 1980
>
Council_Minutes_1980_10_14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2011 2:19:08 PM
Creation date
2/7/2011 2:26:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL October 14, 1980 <br />Regular Meeting Page Two <br />Mr. Rod Kelsey was present also. Mayor McCarty and <br />the other Council members complimented Mr. Kelsey's <br />efforts in this program. <br />MOTION: Rowley made a motion, seconded by Hodges, <br />to accept and adopt the Stanton Associates salary <br />administration and performance review program as <br />presented to them this evening. <br />Ayes -5 <br />Nays -0 <br />Ayes -5 <br />Nays -0 <br />Ayes -5 <br />Nays -0 <br />MOTION CARRIED. <br />Mayor McCarty asked to have Item #F removed for 6. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA <br />discussion. <br />MOTION: Hodges made a motion, seconded by Ziebarth, <br />to approve the consent agenda minus Item #F) <br />and to waive the readings of the resolutions. <br />MOTION CARRIED. <br />Mayor McCarty asked to have the wording of Item #F <br />read "Receive" instead of "Accept" George M. Hanson <br />Company's proposal for the 1980 Audit. <br />MOTION: McCarty made a motion, seconded by Ziebarth, <br />tinge "accept" to "receive" on Item #F (re: the <br />George M. Hanson Company's proposal for 1980 Audit) <br />MOTION CARRIED. <br />The Council also noted that they wished to have the City <br />review other bids at a future date. <br />DISCUSSION ON ITEM #F <br />(1980 Audit Proposal) <br />Upon receiving a request from the Planning Commission 7. James Odle Variance Request <br />and City Council, Attorney Meyers searched the existing 8070 Red Oak Drive <br />city codes to determine the enforceability of the 5' Case 63 -80 <br />driveway set back. Upon investigating this issue, <br />Attorney Meyers determined that this set back require- <br />ment is enforceable under the existing city codes. <br />He also noted that the City's Building Official could <br />not issue a building permit for the construction of a <br />concrete or asphalt driveway within the defined side <br />yard set backs unless a valid variance was granted by <br />the Planning Commission or, upon appeal, to the Council. <br />Attorney Meyers read a memo (dated October 14, 1980) written <br />by himself to the City of Mounds View indicating the various <br />applicable existing city codes regarding this 5' setback <br />requirement. He also attached copies of legal opinions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.