My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Council_Minutes_1981_01_26
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
Council Minutes 1981
>
Council_Minutes_1981_01_26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2011 2:29:32 PM
Creation date
2/7/2011 2:26:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL January 26, 1981 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br />Attorney Meyers and Administrator Pauley pre- <br />sented some discussion items to the Council <br />regarding the wetlandr ordinance. <br />Administrator Pauley listed four items that the <br />Mounds View wetlands ordinance may control: <br />1. Nutrients <br />2. Sedimentation <br />3. Storage <br />4. Wildlife <br />Pauley also noted that if an engineering firm <br />was enlisted to make these determinations, they <br />should have sufficient credentials to be able <br />to identify these four areas. The extent of the <br />study would be determined by the restrictiveness <br />non restrictiveness of the ordinance. <br />Attorney Meyers informed the Council that the <br />presently proposed ordinance would prohibit any <br />development of wetlands 462 -468. He suggested <br />the possibility of listing wetlands 462 -465 as <br />prohibiting any development and wetlands 466 -468 <br />could allow some development by conditional use <br />permit. He also asked Council if the City would <br />want to obtain an engineering study to identify <br />what would be controlled by the wetlands ordinance <br />and what classifications would be nezdP' to <br />achieve that purpose. <br />Neil Loeding, Planning Commissioner, also present <br />in the audience noted that the cost of this pro- <br />posed study should be considered carefully before <br />implementation. <br />In summary, Administrator Pauley noted that to <br />evaluate the present conditions of the wetlands <br />identified in the Rice Creek Watershed study, the <br />following factors would have to be considered: <br />1. The amount of runoff contributing to the <br />wetland from the drainage area and the <br />capacity of that area to handle that water <br />for storage, <br />2. The sedimentation <br />3. Select the engineering firm with the <br />capability of analyzing the wildlife. <br />4. Determine what wetland types designated <br />112 -468 are absolutely needed. <br />5. What wetlands currently exist that would <br />allow some future development to occur. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.