Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council April 25, 1983 <br />Regular Meeting Page Three <br />Director Johnson pointed out the subdivision is for <br />a group of buildings, not for each of the proposed <br />units. <br />Councilmember Hankner noted that the majority of <br />the zoning in the area is R -2 and R -3. <br />Mayor McCarty stated he felt the density wound be <br />too high with townhouses and asked Mr. Dalberg if <br />he would be agreeable to having R -2 lots on Silver <br />Lake Road. <br />Mr. Dalberg replied that he had originally asked <br />for R -2. <br />Mayor McCarty stated that he does not agree <br />with the Planning Commission recommendation, as the <br />Council is following the Comp Plan and the Planning <br />Commission seems to have deviated from it. He <br />stated Mr. Dalberg has the option to withdraw <br />his request and go back to the Planning Commission <br />if he would like. <br />Director Johnson explained the differences in <br />zoning between R -1, R -2 and R -3. <br />Mr. Holmes stated he was against R -2 and would like <br />R -1 zoning. <br />Mr. Zuidema stated he was not in favor of R -2, as <br />it would be rental property. <br />Mr. Wolf stated he did not want the development. <br />Motion /Second: McCarty /Linke to approve the first <br />reading of Ordinance No. 339, amending the R -3 to <br />R -2, in compliance with the Comp Plan, with the <br />applicant's consent and agreementfrom R to R 2, <br />rather than R -1 to R 3, and taking into account <br />the recommendation of the Planning Commission, <br />to change the zoning from R -1, and waive the <br />reading. <br />4 ayes 0 nays <br />Motion /Second: McCarty Hankner to table Resolu- <br />tions No. 1597 and 1598 until such time as Staff <br />has the opportunity to confer with the applicant <br />on these resolutions and redraw the development <br />agreement. <br />4 ayes 0 nays <br />Motion Carried <br />Motion Carried <br />