Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council May 9, 1983 <br />Regular Meeting Page Seven <br />Mayor McCarty stated that in reference to the plans <br />that were app roved, granting services to lots 17, 18 <br />and 19, they were approved at the same time easements <br />were given, which is not compatible, and was an over <br />site. <br />Park Director Anderson reported the Park Board has been <br />dealing with the issue of leaf composting for the past <br />few years, and it has come to the City's attention that <br />Ramsey County is considering expanding their compost <br />program, and they are considering Mounds View as a <br />possible site. He reported the Park Board had reviewed <br />it and feel very positive about it, as it would cost <br />the City basically no money, with the funding coming <br />from the County. Some locations they discussed were <br />Ardan Park, or Greenfield Park, or the old Moega Farm. <br />It was the concensus of the Council to have Staff draw <br />up the necessary resolution for the proposed compost <br />project. <br />Councilmember Blanchard asked the status of the problem <br />with the delivery of the City newsletter. Park Director <br />Anderson replied there had been many problems with <br />delivery this time, and they are looking at other options. <br />He stated he would be getting back to the Council with <br />a report. <br />Councilmember Hankner reported she had still not <br />received a written report from her Counsel, and hopes <br />to have it very soon. She stated she would prefer <br />to table action until she receives it. <br />Motion /Second: McCarty /Doty to direct Staff to <br />notify the Mounds View DFL Club not to use the <br />City's name on their literature. <br />4 ayes 1 nay <br />Councilmember Hankner voted against the motion, stating <br />she would prefer waiting for a legal opinion, and she <br />did not feel the motion differed from motions made at <br />previous meetings. <br />Councilmember Linke asked for clarification of how the <br />notice was to be made, and by whom. Mayor McCarty <br />replied that it would be by Staff, which the Cou.icil <br />interpreted as not to be City Attorney Meyers, and <br />it would be in the normal manner used by Staff to <br />notify people of violations. <br />Director Johnson reviewed his memo of May 9 to the <br />Council, concerning the Mr. Donut development <br />proposal, and reviewed the changes the applicant <br />has made in his proposed development. <br />10. Consideration <br />of Action Re- <br />garding Mounds <br />View DFL Club <br />Use of City <br />Corporate Name <br />Motion Carried <br />11 Report of <br />Director of <br />Public Works/ <br />Comm. Dvlpmt <br />