My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Council_Minutes_1983_11_14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
Council_Minutes_1983_11_14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 9:54:51 AM
Creation date
2/7/2011 2:27:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
11/14/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council November 14, 1983 <br />Regulax Meeting Page Ten <br />could come to some type of compromise and not take <br />the most liberal position. <br />Councilmember Hankner questioned what criteria <br />could be used to determine where the boundries are. <br />Councilmember Doty replied they could take half the <br />difference. <br />Mayor McCarty stated the ordinance does not contemplate <br />readjusting the boundries without certain proof, and <br />the stated the Council should require it. <br />Councilmember Linke stated that in 1 -23, Braun has <br />come back with delineations, stating there was an <br />error in the original map. He pointed out that the <br />City hired Braun, so they should go with their <br />recommendation. <br />Councilmember Hankner reminded the Council that e <br />few months ago, when they were trying to determine <br />boundries, they decided they needed a firm other <br />than the developers firm, so they paid $5,000 for <br />the Braun report, and they now have information from <br />three reports, and questioned why the Council cannot <br />determine where the boundries are. <br />Mayor McCarty replied that the Council's action on <br />'tiring a consultant was well thought out, and the <br />money came from the SWM fund, which is paid by <br />developers, but that the consultants have not <br />provided the City with the information needed. <br />Councilmember Linke pointed out that on 1 -23, the <br />Council asked them to redelineate, according to <br />the information they gathered in their work. He <br />added that it is time the City accepts their <br />redelineation, as the old one has been proven wrong <br />three times by three different engineering firms. <br />Councilmember Hankner stated she felt the Braun <br />report was the most accurate, with the most facts <br />and information. <br />Councilmember Blanchard stated she agreed, and that <br />the City had paid for the Braun report and they <br />should accept it. <br />Councilmember Doty stated they should take the <br />different recommendations and then compromise, and <br />suggested Mr. Miller draw the lines. Mr. Miller <br />replied that he did not consider himself qualified. <br />Neil Loeding stated the Council has three different <br />expert opinions, and there is latitude. He warned <br />the Council they might well be advised to take a <br />more conservative interpretation, in the best interest <br />of the City, or they would be turning the ordinance <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.