Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council March 12, 1984 <br />Regular Meeting Page Eight <br />Councilmember Linke pointed out that earlier in the <br />year the Council authorized Attorney Meyers to go ahead <br />at any time he feels the lawsuit should be implemented, <br />and that Attorney Meyers has stated he would like to <br />have the consultant study in hand and preliminary work done <br />before returning to court. He stated he has not had <br />an opportunity to review the consultant proposal. <br />Councilmember Hankner stated she also was not given <br />anything to review from the consultant who has expressed <br />interest in working for the City. She also pointed out <br />that according to the agenda, the topic for this <br />evening was a discussion of the Anoka County Blaine <br />Airport improvements, not whether to proceed with legal <br />action. <br />Councilmember Blanchard stated that since she did not <br />make a statement during the lengthy debate, she would <br />like to preface her vote by saying that because this <br />motion only reaffirms what the Council did previously, <br />she would vote yes. <br />oirector Thatcher reported bids had been opened earlier <br />in the day for the servicing of Well No. 2, and re- <br />viewed the bids received and recommended it be awarded <br />to the lower bidder, E. H. Renner Sons, Inc., in the <br />amount of $11,342. He advised he has done business <br />with them before and feels they are a reputable firm. <br />Motion /Second: Hankner /Linke to approve the award <br />to E. H. Renner and Sons, Inc., in the amount of <br />$11,342 for Well No. 2 maintenance. <br />5 ayes 0 nays <br />Director Thatcher reported that new developments <br />have come up regarding the storm water drainage <br />capabilities. The major issue at the Planning <br />Commission meeting was the size of the storm <br />water retention basin, and that in speaking with <br />John Johnson today, the size required was deter- <br />mined to be 7 /l0ths of an acre, and the developer <br />is proposing a 3.3 acre retention basin, which is <br />four times the required size. He pointed out this <br />'nuld go a long way toward solving the problems of <br />orm water drainage in that area of the City. <br />8. Consideration <br />of Bids for the <br />Servicing of <br />Well No. 2 <br />Motion Carried <br />9. Consideration of <br />Staff Memo <br />Regarding <br />Christopher <br />Companies <br />Development <br />Proposal <br />