Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Page 3 <br />June 10, 1996 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />Ace Solid Waste -Renewal <br />Waste Management of Blaine -Renewal <br />• <br />• <br />MOTION/SECOND: Hankner/Quick to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. <br />VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR: <br />Mayor Linke explained that this portion of the meeting was designated for anyone who wished to speak to <br />the Council on items that were not on the Agenda. <br />Ron Schmidt, 8456 Groveland Road, asked about the 4% franchise fee that was enacted on the businesses <br />and residents of Mounds View in 1992, and what the date of the sunset clause on this. franchise fee was. <br />He also asked what the franchise fees have been used for. <br />Mayor Linke stated that he believes the sunset is in 1997. This was a five year franchise fee, which began <br />in 1993. However, he noted that he could not recall that this franchise fee was ever mentioned as "short <br />term" ,but rather a permanent addition to the taxing system. Without incorporating the franchise fee, an <br />average resident would likely have paid more in tax increases that it did on an average franchise fee, as the <br />fee has not changed, but property taxes have. <br />Mayor Linke explained that the franchise fees raised an average of $200,000 per year for the city. <br />Approximatley $170,000 to $180,000 went to buy down property taxes. A portion also went into the Golf <br />Course Management fund to help defray the first years operational costs. Most of the funds however have <br />gone towards property tax buydowns. <br />Ms. Hankner noted that $80,000 of the fee last year was appropriated over to the building of the pedestrian <br />bridge. What concerns her is that the city does not have a firm policy on the use of the franchise fees. <br />She however also understood that this was a temporary revenue source. Most residents have indicated to <br />her that they would rather see an increase in their property tax than to have a franchise fee, as property <br />taxes can at least be used on their income taxes as a deduction. <br />Mayor Linke noted that unless the franchise fee is re-adopted during the budgeting process, it will continue <br />only through 1997. <br />Mr. Schmitdt also stated his concern in regard to many of the expenditures authorized by the City Council <br />over the past several months. He stated as a member of the Economic Development Commission, he did <br />not feel the decision process in regard to the city's purchase of the Bel-Rae Ballroom was handled <br />appropriately. He did not feel the EDC really had an opportunity to thoroughly look at the issue before the <br />Economic Development Authority made a decision, and with the amount of diversified knowledge of those <br />serving on the Commission, they could have provided perhaps some valuable information. <br />Dan Nelson, President of the Economic Development Commission, was also present and discussed his <br />concern about the apparent lack of communication between the Economic Development Commission and <br />the City Council. In regard to the Bel-Rae Ballroom purchase, he can fmd no mention in the minutes of <br />the meetings as to the EDC's recommendation. He noted that the members of the EDC take their roles <br />