Laserfiche WebLink
Page 5 <br />November 12, 1996 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />Non-Residential Conditional Uses in Residential Districts, and Amending Title 1100, Sections <br />1102.01,1104.01,1104.02,1106.04,1107.05,1109.0-4,1110.04, 1121.09,1121.11 and 1123.02. <br />Mayor Linke opened the Public Hearing at 7:40 p.m. <br />Ms. Sheldon, Director of Community Development, explained that this item relates to non-residential uses <br />that are permitted in residential districts. In a recent proposal to the City of Mounds View for a church to <br />be constructed in a residential district, concern was raised by residents in the area who felt that the five foot <br />requirement was not sufficient to provide adequate buffering between parking lots and residences. One of <br />the residents from the neighborhood proposed an amendment to the City Code, which would increase the <br />five foot requirement to fifteen feet between parking lots and property lines. After review, the Planning <br />Commission has recommended that the setback be 20 feet for sites of 2.5 acres or less, and 30 feet for sites <br />of more than 2.5 acres. In addition, the Planning Commission and staff looked at some other issues which <br />they felt needed to be addressed at the same time such as minimum lot size requirements for larger scale, <br />non-residential uses. The proposed changes would require a minimum one acre lot size for non-residential <br />use. Ms. Sheldon also explained other items which the proposed ordinance would clarify. <br />With no questions from the Council or residents, Mayor Linke closed the Public Hearing at 7:44 p.m. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Hankner/Trade to approve the Introduction of Ordinance No. 590, Relating to <br />Setbacks for Parking Lots, Driveways, and Principal and Accessory Buildings; Minimum Lot Area for <br />Non-Residential Uses Listed as Conditional Uses in Residential Districts; the Continued Use of Non- <br />conforming Parking Lots for Non-Residential Conditional Uses in Residential Districts, and Amending <br />Title 1100, Sections 1102.01, 1104.01, 1104.02, 1106.04, 1107.05, 1109.04, 1110.04, 1121.09, 1121.11 <br />and 1123.02, and to waive the reading. <br />VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />Public Hearing Considering the Adoption of Resolution No. 5040, Bronson Drive Reconstruction <br />Assessment Roll. <br />Mayor Linke opened the Public Hearing at 7:45 p.m. <br />Mr. Ulrich, Public Works Director, provided an outline of events as they occurred in relation to the <br />Bronson Drive Reconstruction project, including the dates in which letters were sent to affected residents <br />informing them of the status of the project. The final cost of the project was $728,233, with $399,916 <br />being paid by the city, and $328,618 to be paid by residents. Two assessment rolls were prepared, one <br />taking into consideration applying the $15,000 in the storm water management fund to the cost, should it <br />be the council's desire to do so. <br />Mr. Barry Peters, of Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, provided a diagram of the project area and gave a brief <br />summary of the work that was done. He also discussed the final project costs and assessment numbers for <br />the project breaking down the various improvements including the street project, storm ponding, storm <br />sewer construction, sanitary sewer lateral and the sanitary sewer service. <br />Mr. Ulrich provided information on how residents could file an objection to the assessment if they wished <br />to do so. Procedures were also provided on how to file a petition with the city. He noted that the <br />