My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1996/11/12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
Minutes - 1996/11/12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2025 1:26:41 PM
Creation date
2/8/2011 12:26:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
11/12/1996
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 8 <br />November 12, 1996 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />Greg Newman, 5323 Jackson Drive, stated he is being assessed for the storm sewer project. He wondered <br />why Lampert Park is still having water problems whenever there is a storm. He assumed that this <br />problem would be corrected as a part of the improvements. Mr. Peters stated there are some problems <br />with storm sewers in Mounds View with the sizing that was put in and this may be part of the problem. <br />Michelle Madsen, 5420 Adams St., explained that she did receive the first letter -did not understand that <br />her property would be affected and then did not hear again until she received the final letter notifying her <br />of her assessments. <br />David Kraft, 5323 Cliffton Rd., asked for clarification on his assessments. <br />Duane Nelson, 5459 Quincy St., stated he would like to know if there are any other drainage areas coming <br />into EW-6 or 35W-3 from any other area beyond Edgewood and if so, if those residents are assessed as <br />well. <br />Mr. Barry Peters explained that the drainage districts were set up in the original storm sewer plans <br />throughout the city and those are the only ones who paid for it. <br />Laura Sokol-Kraft, 5290 Pinewood Court, stated the 30 day payment requirement is very difficult at this <br />time of the year and she does not appreciate the finance charges being added after the 30 day period, when <br />she had no prior notice. She also questioned why her entire property is being assessed. Mr. Peters <br />explained that her property drains into the system. A discussion followed in regard to drainage problems <br />in front of her property. Mr. Long, City Attorney provided information as to the process any resident <br />should follow if they wish to challenge the assessment. <br />Sue Mitchell, 5493 Quincy Street, stated she was not aware that the improvements to Bronson Drive would <br />affect her property. She did receive both letters, but feels they were unclear. <br />Dennis McCann, 2215 Bronson Drive, asked for clarification on the financing option offered by the city. <br />Mr. Kessel provided an explanation but noted that residents do not have to take advantage of this <br />financing. <br />Diane Weinmann, 2209 Bronson Drive, complimented Mike Ulrich and Julie Trude for their efforts in <br />getting the Wetland cleaned out behind Bronson Drive. The sidewalk has been a great addition to the <br />project. She feels the concerns expressed by residents are a result miscommunication. Many of the <br />details were not conveyed to the residents. <br />Jarmund Schmidt, 5315 Raymond Ave., asked why the project was ever done and if the decision had <br />anything to do with the Bel Rae property. He also had questions in regard to his assessment in comparison <br />to the duplex property across the street from him. <br />Mr. Linke explained that when the streets were looked at, Bronson Drive was considered to be in poor <br />condition. He further noted that this project had nothing to do with the city's purchase of the Bel Rae <br />property. <br />With no further comments, Mayor Linke closed the Public Hearing at 10:22 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.