My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1996/10/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
Minutes - 1996/10/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2025 1:26:41 PM
Creation date
2/8/2011 12:38:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
10/14/1996
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 4 <br />• October 14, 1996 <br />Mounds View City Council <br />attention of the City Council. He noted that the Council's action on September 23, 1996 in accepting <br />Council member Hankner's resignation by a simple motion appears non-conforming to Charter Section <br />2.05, MN State Law 410.21 and Charter Section 4.05. He further stated that the Charter Commission <br />respectfully suggests that Council member Hankner resubmit her resignation effective by November 4, <br />1996 to insure compliance with the Charter requirements should it remain her desire to avoid a Special <br />Election. The Charter Commission also requested that the City Council not act on any Charter changes <br />currently before them. <br />Mr. Bob Long, City Attorney, explained that the Council was unaware of Ms. Hankner's resignation until <br />the September 23rd meeting, therefore a Resolution had not be prepared for approval at the meeting. What <br />the Council did was act by a motion due to the absence of a written resolution with the intention of <br />approving the Resolution at the next meeting. He explained that the City has followed the Charter <br />requirements and that under Section 2.05 of the Charter, one of the conditions in which the City Council <br />can acknowledge a vacancy that is deemed to exist is when a written resignation is before them. A written <br />letter was submitted by Ms. Hankner at the September 23rd meeting. In regard to resignations which <br />become effective at a future date, the Charter is silent, and therefore the City must refer to State Law. <br />Ruth White, 2917 County Road I, noted a correction of Charter Commission Resolution 96-1. The ninth <br />paragraph should be changed from "City Council" to "City Charter". <br />Alice Fritz, 8072 Long Lake Road, stated as an election judge she feels the way the Ms. Hankner's Council <br />seat will be filled is unfair to people who are now running for office and those who may have run if they <br />had been aware of the other position available. She feels it is unfair to the voters because the ballots will <br />not disclose that they will be voting for three. She would like the Council to reconsider having a special <br />election. <br />David Jahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road, asked if the ballots will be fixed so that voters will know that they <br />are voting for three. <br />Mayor Linke noted that the ballots will not be fixed. <br />Attorney Long explained that the State Law requires that the City turn in the names of the candidates to the <br />County Auditor within 45 days of the election. At the time they were submitted, there were only two <br />council seats open. The Charter also states that the City cannot file less than 56 days before the election. <br />Therefore, the seats will be filled by the two receiving the most votes, but a third name is not being listed <br />on the ballot because they have already be turned in to the County. <br />Mayor Linke explained that the voters will be electing the two four-year term seats. Voters will be made <br />aware that even though they are only voting for two, three people will be elected. The third highest vote <br />will take over Ms. Hankner's remaining two years. <br />Ms. Hankner explained that in a general election, there will be a larger number of people voting that the <br />city will get in a special election. The city is following the State Law and the Charter Requirement and the <br />City is fulfilling their responsibility of abiding by those guidelines. <br />• It was noted that voters will be told that they can only vote for two. If they vote for three, the ballot will be <br />spoiled. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.