My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1995/08/21
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
Minutes - 1995/08/21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2025 1:27:06 PM
Creation date
2/8/2011 12:47:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
8/21/1995
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 9 <br />• August 21, 1995 <br />Keith Vasilakes, 5131 Greenwood Drive, stated he felt Option #1 was basically spending <br />$800,000 to correct a $30,000 problem. He would rather be charged an additional five <br />cents on his water bill. He sees no reason for the phone or radio system as he does not <br />feel the city needs a state of the art system. Additionally he did not feel two proposals for <br />a $800,000 system were a sufficient representation and additional bids should be received. <br />Kathleen Harrer, 5230 Edgewood Drive, asked if the city anticipates that the $31,000 loss <br />each year will continue to increase. She is aiso concerned about her "out of the pocket" <br />costs for the new system. How much will the city save over a 20 year period if the water <br />system is changed? <br />Mr. Linke explained that the only cost to the resident would be the $3.00 utility charge. If <br />the city chooses to select the touch read system, there will be no additional charge. Mr. <br />Ulrich stated the city will expect to save approximately $1,000,000 over the 20 year <br />period if they replace the meters. <br />Ms. Harrer asked if she will get her meter deposit back when the system is changed over. <br />- Mr. Ulrich replied that they will refund those who paid for their meters if a new meter <br />must be installed. <br />Carl Anderson, 2948 Wooddale Drive, stated figuring the loss of $31,500 per year and <br />spending $800,000 for Option #1 it would take 2b years to recoup the cost. Option #2 <br />would take 16 years to recoup the costs. Neither of these options provides for repayment <br />of the $300,000 WAC fund. He would like to suggest Option #4, which would include <br />changing all commercial meters to the radio read out with a quarterly reading, beginning <br />residential change overs to meters which are over 20 years old and offering a touch pad <br />system for whose who do not want their meters read annually. This option would allow a <br />phase in of the new system without a project loan. <br />Mr. Ulrich noted that the system is deteriorating and it will continue to do so. The figure <br />of $31,500 will continue to increase. <br />In regard to meter deposits, Mr. Don Brager, Finance Director offered the following. He <br />stated the city has a record of those people who paid for the water meters and the dollar <br />amount. The practice of having one pay for their own meter ceased in the 1980's. The <br />city has attempted to get more new meters in by asking that when property is sold a new <br />meter must be installed by the new owner of the property. Gradually the fund has been <br />shrinking as the properties change hands, etc., However, there are still a number of <br />deposits which will need to be refunded. <br />Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, stated if the entire system is replaced with Option <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.