Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council Page 3 <br />Regular Meeting June 12,,1995 <br />Mayor Linke asked if there were any items the Council desired <br />removed from the Consent Agenda; there were none. <br />MOTIONfSECOND: Trude/Quick to Adopt the Consent Agenda as <br />Presented <br />VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR: <br />Mayor Linke explained that this portion of the meeting was <br />designated for anyone who wished to speak to the Council on items <br />that were not on the Agenda. There were no comments or requests <br />from the floor. <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS: <br />Continue Public Hearing to Consider the Formal Adoption of <br />Ordinance No. 561 Amending Appendix A "Specific Rezoninc~s," of_ the_ <br />Mounds View Municipal Code <br />Mayor Linke opened the public hearing at 7:05 p.m. <br />• Paul Harrington, Community Development Coordinator, reported that <br />Larry Beach had made application for the rezoning of the former Tom <br />Thumb property at 7305 Knollwood Drive. The property is currently <br />zoned B-1 which is a Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District. Mr. <br />Beach would like the property rezoned to R-2 which is Single and <br />Two-family Resident_Lal. The applicant wishes to construct two twin <br />homes on the property to be sold as owner-occupied units at some <br />time in the future. <br />a. Consideration of Adoption of Ordinance No. 561_Amendin <br />the Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Appendix_A_ <br />Entitled, "Sppecific Rezonin~s" <br />At the May 8, 1995 City Council Meeting this Ordinance <br />was introduced; it does require two readings. <br />Mr. Harrington clarified that Mounds View City Code <br />states that all Ordinances must be adopted with three <br />affirmative votes of the Council; however, State Law <br />requires that a two-thirds vote be secured for any <br />rezonings. In reviewing the matter with City Attorney <br />Thomson, it was determined that State Law overrules the <br />City Charter in this particular instance. This Ordinance <br />would require four affirmative votes. <br />• <br />