Laserfiche WebLink
Page 10 <br />September 11, 1995 <br />n <br />into the program and then the testing of the seven seasonal employees and the eleven maintenance <br />employees is estimated to cost $526.32. This could fluctuate depending upon the number of times the <br />city teats. There is an amount budgeted to cover this type of expense. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Hankner to Approve Resolution 4806, Authorizing the City of Mounds <br />View to Enter into a Service Agreement with Ken Transportation Service, Inc. <br />VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />D. Consideration of Resolution 4812, Establishing a Contingency Fund Policy. <br />Samantha Orduno explained that for a very long time expenditures have coxes out of the general <br />contingency fund without any formal policy. Staff was requested at a prior Council meeting to develop <br />a draft Contingency Fund Policy for the council to review at the September work session. This policy <br />was reviewed and changed as recommended. Ms. Orduno noted that one correction should be made to <br />the Resolution, II Policy Statement, B. "The expenditures from the fund ... " rather than "The funds <br />from the fund...". <br />MOTION/SECOND: HanknerBlanchard to Approve Resolution 4812, with the amendment as <br />recommended by Ms. Orduno. <br />Ms. Trude stated originally when this was brought up she was very concerned the council would get <br />involved in a lot of debate about the policy instead of whether the expenditure was warranted. She <br />does not have objection to aay of the contents of the policy. <br />Ms. Hankner took this opportunity to commend the staff for putting the policy together. She feels it <br />goes far beyond her expectations, and nicely lays out the guidelines and perimeters about whether or <br />not the council should fund something out of the contingency funds. <br />Ms. Orduno noted that this policy will be made a part of the Budget. <br />VOTE: S ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />E. Consideration of Resolution 4813, Amendment to the Abatement Order. <br />Mr. Harrington explained that in 1994 the city received an abatement order for the property located at <br />7618 Edgewood Drive. This is a four Alex which was in a very delapitated state. The city got the <br />abatement order to go in and make certain repairs that the property owner had failed to do to meet <br />minimum building standards. Since the time that the City has been in the process of doing this, the <br />owner has failed to pay registration and has abandoned the building. There are Currently two families <br />living in the four-plex without paying rent. Staff contacted the City Attorney about the possibility of <br />boarding up the two vacant units to prevent others from going in. He stated a resolution authorizing <br />the city to go in and board of the two units was necessary because there could be a question of <br />trespassing violations. The resolution will also allow the city to board up other units as they become <br />vacant. <br /> <br />