My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
gr00090_000025_pg041
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
MNHistoricalSocietyFiles (CC Minutes page-by-page 1958-1981)
>
gr00090_000025
>
gr00090_000025_pg041
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2011 2:34:25 PM
Creation date
4/12/2011 9:13:43 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- 4 - <br />Harold Bisset, 2204 Lois Drive, inquired as to barriers or buffer zones. <br />Mayor Rustad stated that the highway would serve as a buffer zone. <br />Mr. Miller stated that an additional buffer zone of trees or shrubs surrounding <br />the park would be provided. <br />Harold Hjelle, 5161 Red Oak Drive, asked if not the property was zoned light <br />industrial now. He stated that since it was, any business could not put kids <br />in the school district and if there was 80 to 100 acres removed from the <br />industrial zoning it would be adding more kids per acre to our school district. <br />William Werner, 2101 Sherwood Road, inquired about screening. <br />Carol Baumgartner, 7585 Knollwood Drive, inquired into the back taxes and if <br />the owner could not be required to pay these taxes. <br />Ray Faricy, Watson Construction Company attorney, owner of the property stated <br />that back taxes totalled approximately $40,000, that the majority of this was <br />back assessments, that only approximately $2,000 was back taxes. Mr. Faricy <br />stated that with the soil being what it was and the high water table he felt <br />that the owners would not be paying any taxes on the property since it was not <br />usable. He stated that the payment of the back taxes and assessments is to be <br />picked up by the purchaser according to their purchase agreement if the rezoning <br />is approved. <br />Ray Gifford, 2256 Lois Drive, asked the building inspector if in fact the <br />Village would approve a building permit for a mobile home park. Mr. Gifford <br />also suggested that the land be used for a golf course. <br />Mrs. Haake, 1740 County Road I, felt that it would be cheaper to have a golf <br />course on that piece of property than to have the additional burden of added <br />school children in the district. <br />Gerry Foss, 8455 Spring Lake Road, asked Mr. Faricy if anyone had approached <br />the owner for building light industrial. Mr. Faricy said there was no offer; <br />that in his estimation there was at least six feet of peat at the minimum. <br />Richard Paradise, 5091 Eastwood Drive, stated that it would be possible to <br />pile only under the building if it was built on peat, that it would not be <br />necessary to dredge out all the peat for the parking area. He felt that since <br />we were on the edge of the metropolitan area we would get industry if we were <br />patient. <br />Ronald Goodroad, 7901 Eastwood Drive, stated that if the airport goes through <br />we will get at least a trucking industry in the area. <br />James Nerdahl, 7941 Edgewood Drive, inquired if people were an asset and if <br />traffic was a problem how we could have both. He stated that the picture of <br />the peat bog showed by Mr. Miller was over a year old. <br />Mr. Bayerkohler, 5095 Sunnyside, stated that the health,safety and welfare of <br />residents was endangered by the additional taxes placed on the property by the <br />school children. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.