Laserfiche WebLink
PROCEEDINGS OF THE VILLAGE COUiQCIL <br />VILLAGE OF MOUNDS VIEW <br />RA.MSEY COUNTY, MINNE$)T.A <br />September 21, 1970 <br />An assessment hearing was called to order by Mayor R .,stal at 6:30 P.M. on Monday <br />September 21, 1970, at the iT,_•'_ I age Hall, 2401 Highway #10, St. Paul, Minnesota <br />55112 to consider adopting the assessment role for Water Improvement Project <br />196 -3 HUD. <br />re t <br />Pre.�.,:n � <br />Mayor Tiu; a <br />Councilman Malvin <br />Councilman Hodges <br />Councilman Blanchard <br />Councilman Nelsen <br />Also Present: <br />Clerk-Administrator Zylia <br />Attorney Meyers <br />Engineer Boehm <br />Clerk-Administrator Zylia read the legal notice and attested t o i t z s publication in <br />the New Brighton Bulletin September 1Ot'a and 17th. <br />NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT NEARING <br />MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENTS <br />VILLAGE OF MOUNDS VIEW, <br />MINNESOTA <br />NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN That the <br />Viliege Council of the Village of Mounds <br />View, Minnesota will meet at the Village <br />Hall, 2401 Highway No. 10, in said Village on <br />Monday, September 21, 1970, at 6:30 o'clock <br />P.M. for the purpose of conducting a public <br />hearing on the assessments proposed to be <br />made( against property benefited by <br />Municipal Improvements. Said im- <br />provement consists of the following work: <br />1. WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS <br />A. County Road J— Eastwood Road to <br />Groveland Road. • <br />B. Eastwood Road — County Road J to 500' <br />South. <br />C. Long Lake Road (West) — County Road J <br />to Arden Avenue. <br />D. Sherwood Road — Jackson Drive to <br />Quincy Street. <br />E. County Road 1— Groveland Road to S. T. <br />H. 10. <br />F. State Trunk Hwy. 10 (South)— County <br />Road 1. to Long Lake Road. <br />G. Long l,,ake Road— S.T.H. 10 to Woodale <br />Drive. • <br />H. Ridge Lane —Long Lake Road to Iron- <br />dale Road. <br />I. State Trunk Hwy. 10— Raymond Avenue <br />to County Road H. <br />J. Raymond Avenue — County Road H to <br />County Road 14-2. <br />K. Woodland, Avenue— Jackson Drive to <br />Quincy Streit). <br />L. Woodale Drive (North) — Pleasant View <br />Drive to 300' least. <br />M. Interstate Hwy. 35W (West)-42' North <br />of to 630' South of. Oakland Ave. <br />The area proposed to be assessed for <br />special benefit derived from said im- <br />provement is every lot, piece and parcel <br />abutting on the above described streets and <br />Highways. <br />The roll of assessments is now on file in . <br />the office of the Village Clerk. <br />AU persons whose property mitt be so <br />assessed may, at the above stated tiMaand <br />place, present oral or written objections to <br />said assessments. <br />Dated September 1, 1970. <br />BY ORDER OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL <br />Dennis Zylia <br />Village Clerk- Administrator <br />(Bulletin: Sept. 10, 17, 1970) <br />Engineer Boehm described the project and pointed out the areas to be assessed on <br />a map. He stat31 that watermain was being assessed $5.50 p32. foot and water services <br />were being assessed $125.11 ev2h,. <br />Mr. Danielson, 8445 Eastwood Road, objected to water assessment in back since water <br />was in front on Eastwood Road. Engineer Boehm explained that this assessment was <br />on a new lot (Lot 5) which did not border. Da Eastwood Road. Itc. Danielson also <br />would .like reimbursement for a cut tractor tire ($20). He feels a service should <br />be installed to Lot 5 also. Min. Danielson doesnit feel he has benefited. <br />Mr, Peary Copeland, representing White Oak Builder's, requested information on the <br />calculation o=' frontage for parcel O30 --81 and 170 - -5:) in Section 7 and S respectively. <br />He stated parcel 030• -81 should nob be assessed for more than 184 feet. He stated <br />he (canted parcel 170 -50 recalculated since he does n;t '_;el the 1633.3 foot figure <br />used by the engineer is a <br />curate. <br />Mr. Danielson asked abut having his property resurveyed since the contractor knocked <br />out some stakes. Mayor Rustad stated that he should :include his comments in a letter <br />to the Council before final payment is made to the contractor. <br />