Laserfiche WebLink
- 3 - <br />Mr. Dropps felt that it would have been necessary at least on Long Lake Road. <br />Mr. Dropps stated that he was unaware when he petitioned for the improvements <br />that it included storm sewer. Engineer Boehm again reiterated that this was <br />not a storm sewer, that it was merely a drainage assessment connected with the <br />construction of the blacktop streets. He stated that it could have been called <br />street preparation costs. Engineer Boehm stated the major cost of the drainage <br />assessment is street preparation. He stated that at least 20,000 yards had to <br />be excavated. <br />Acting Mayor Blanchard called for objections. <br />Ed Dropps of White Oak Builders objected to the drainage assessment on Woodale <br />Drive between Long Lake Road and Eastwood Road. <br />There were no other objections. <br />Acting Mayor Blanchard closed the assessment hearing at 9:10 P.M. <br />Attorney Meyers stated that the only question to be decided by the Council is <br />whether the properties that are being assessed in this hearing are benefited <br />by the full amount of the assessment. If they are not benefited in the <br />determination of the Council, the Council has two alternatives. Number one, <br />it could reassess the project including the properties that were not originally <br />included in the improvement hearing, or two, it could place a portion of the <br />assessment cost on the tax rolls. <br />Councilman Neisen stated that he could not show cause to assess the people <br />south of Woodale Drive. <br />Councilman Johnson did not want to comment on the assessment roll since he lived <br />on Greenwood Drive just south of Woodale Drive and may be included in the proposed <br />assessment area. <br />MSP (Neisen /Hodges) That the following finding of fact be made a part of the <br />record. That the Council has made a determination that the properties included <br />in the assessment roll are benefited to the amount of $7.75 front foot for <br />sanitary sewer lateral, $4.65 a front foot for lateral water, $6.95 a front <br />foot for drainage lateral, $157.50 each for sanitary sewer services and $145.50 <br />each for water services, and therefore they agree to adopt the assessment roll <br />for Project 1971 -1 and 1971 -la (Resolution #536) authorizing the assessment to <br />be levied over 20 years at 8% interest. <br />3 Ayes <br />Johnson Abstained <br />The Council heard a proposal by Mrs. Kay Zwernik, director of the'North Suburban <br />Day Activity Center program which provides preschool and school services to <br />mentally retarded children and young adults in the north suburban area. Mrs. <br />Zwernik gave the Council a historical review of the center and the services which <br />they do provide. She stated that the pilot project began in 1961 and that through <br />the enactment of the daytime activity center bill they are able to match locally <br />raised funds with state funds on a 50 -50 basis. She stated that the average <br />yearly cost per participant was $1,300, versus a cost of between $4,000 and $5,000 <br />to care for a patient in a state hospital. She stated that her 71 -72 budget was <br />$84,437 and that the organization was seeking a combined total of $6,000 from all <br />the communities served in the north suburban area, Mounds View, Arden Hills, <br />Shoreview, New Brighton, Roseville and St. Anthony. She stated that they are <br />requesting from Mounds View a total of $692.40 for the budget year 71 -72, Mrs. <br />Zwernik stated the aim of the program was to place all mentally retarded children <br />in the school system eventually. <br />