Laserfiche WebLink
- 4- <br />Mr. Ernest Freyberger, 5178 Longview Drive: <br />Q - How many feet would the shopping center be from my house? <br />A - Mr. Mueller replied approximately 55 feet. <br />Q - What would it do to my property value? <br />A - Mr. Mueller replied it may increase it. <br />Mrs. Barbara Haake, 1740 County Road I: <br />Q - Isn't there a 40 foot set back on shopping center districts? <br />A - Mr. Meuller replied that this property was zoned B -3, general business, not <br />shopping center. <br />Mr. Edward Mihalow, 2744 County Road H2 replied that he was concerned about the kids <br />in the neighborhood. That persons attending these liquor stores could be careless <br />in their driving and hurt or cripple children of the area. <br />Mr. Lewis Downing, St. Paul (Mounds View property owner): <br />Q - Why hasn't the Planning Commission recommendation been explained since they <br />recommended the proposal? <br />A - Mr. Mueller replied that the Planning Commission was in favor of the building. <br />Councilman Baumgartner declared that the Planning Commission did not recommend approval <br />of the liquor license, that it was only discussed as a general matter and they only <br />expressed approval of the shopping center. Only the Council can approve a liquor <br />license. <br />Mayor Neisen commented that the Industrial Commission has taken a stand against the <br />issuance of a liquor license on this particular piece of property. <br />Mrs. Darven Unruh, 5177 Longview Drive, stated that she was against the issuance of <br />a liquor license. <br />Mr. Harold Hjelle, 5161 Red Oak Drive stated that he was against it because there were <br />three liquor scores currently within 1 mile of the proposal. <br />Mr. James Omdal, 5091 Longview Drive was opposed because of the change in traffic <br />patterns, potential reckless drivers and the fact that the development would be close <br />to a Village park. <br />Mayor Neisen called for those in favor of the proposal. <br />Mr. Lloyd Blanchard, 8005 Groveland Road stated that the last Liquor vote was 5 to 1 <br />in favor. He stated that he could have gotten enough signatures favoring liquor at <br />that location. He added that he doesn't want to pay more in taxes, that Silver Lake <br />Road will be much busier when it is a connector to new Highway #10, whether the <br />residents are opposed to traffic or not, and Mr. Mueller has put together a reasonable <br />proposal. <br />Mr. Perry Malvin, 2220 Sherwood stated that it was a good plan and that the Industrial <br />Commission should support the proposal since they are trying to get businesses to <br />locate in the Village. He related that certain power groups protest everything in <br />the Village. <br />Mrs. Thomas Coplin, 5168 Longview Drive would like to see a shopping center in the area, <br />but a large center is what Mounds View needs, not another convenience operation. <br />