Laserfiche WebLink
-14- <br />Councilman Shelquist's Report <br />Councilman Shelquist reported that the Planning Commission at their regular <br />meeting made a recommendation for increase of maximum garage size to 864 <br />square feet by stating Chapter 40.03 subdivision 4, 4 should be changed from <br />728 to 864 square feet for maximum garage size which means t'at the restriction <br />that ...c<ao than 25% of the rar yl_rd be occupied remain the same. <br />This was referred to Midwest Planning. They said Chapter 40.03 could be changed <br />and the majority of the Planning Commission felt that no variances should <br />be given if it is raised to 864 square feet. <br />Councilman Shelquist read different square feet formulas that could be <br />used to variate size by width and length within the 864 square feet and <br />said that some cities reported they considered th s to be a three -car <br />garage. <br />Councilman Baumgartner felt that a 136 increase in square feet didn't <br />really give a substantial enough increase to cover the wide range of vari- <br />ances people have been asking for in garages. He said we should get <br />into 200 square feet area still keeping the 25%rear yard requirement. <br />Councilman Pickar said taking everything into consideration we could increase <br />the size. He would rather see larger garages than equipment stored outside. <br />Councilman Hodges would rather see larger garages because it looks better <br />than junk stored outside. <br />Mayor Johnson feels Council has an obligation to support the Planning <br />Commission on this issue. He goes along with 864 square feet. <br />Councilman Shelquist feels Council should go with the Planning Commission <br />recommendation also. He said you will find that contractors will not be putting <br />in larger garages on houses being built at this time. <br />MSP (Johnson - Hodges) to direct the city attorney to draft a new ordinance <br />increasing square foot maximum of garage size to 864 square feet 4 Ayes <br />Baumgartner Naye <br />Attorney Meyers' Report <br />Attorney Meyers reported that the court took the George Brooks versus the City <br />of Mounds View case under advisement and instructed Mr. Brooks to leave <br />the bill with them. <br />Attorney Meyers said the Administrator could check into selling property <br />of Fulwider and Hemsworth and that it did not have to be set up for bids. <br />He said this property could be declared surplus and go on the market. <br />Attorney Meyers returned the refund on money that had been deposited <br />for quit claim of land under Project 1973 -4 <br />Engineer Bearden's Report <br />Engineer Bearden reported that there is surplus fill from Project 1973 -4 <br />and inquired what Council would suggest for disposition of the surplus. <br />Attorney Meyers said it could be stock piled at the park on Silver Lake <br />Road. <br />Council directed Administrator Achen to check into depositing and <br />stockpiling fill at the park. <br />Engineer Bearden reported that he had a long discussion with the Rice <br />Creek Watershed Engineer about drainage. He said Rice Creek Watershed <br />was concerned only with the quantity and quality of water flowing into <br />the creek. <br />