My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
gr000990_000040_pg072
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
MNHistoricalSocietyFiles (CC Minutes page-by-page 1958-1981)
>
gr00090_000040
>
gr000990_000040_pg072
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2011 4:30:33 PM
Creation date
4/12/2011 10:00:24 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Administrator's Report <br />March 5, 1976 <br />Order of voting: Councilman Pickar <br />Councilman Shelquist <br />Councilman Hodges <br />Councilman Baumgartner <br />Mayor Johnson <br />1. Agenda items for March 8th Council meeting. SPECIAL NOTE: The <br />agenda is fairly heavy, so I've scheduled several items prior <br />to the 8:15 hearing. All of these items should require very <br />little time. <br />ITEM 4. Schluter - Brogger plat consolidates the three minor sub- <br />divisions previously approved and one additional lot split. <br />They've agreed to the Planning Commission's request to make the <br />back lot lines match up. No other problems. <br />ITEM 5. Bardwell minor subdivision with no problems. Motion to <br />approve should include stipulation that a satisfactory drainage <br />and grading plan be approved by the inspection department before <br />issuance of a building permit. <br />ITEM 6. Spitzer minor subdivision with no problems if motion is <br />to approve the Planning Commission's recommendation. Easements <br />already exist, so not necessary to require them. <br />ITEM 7. White Oak Builders request to reconsider allowing an <br />extension of 100 -day deadline. By disallowing, the city and <br />developer will have to spend unnecessary time repeating the <br />subdivision process. I think there is reasonable cause to extend <br />it, because of our city engineer's mistake. It just happens <br />that Comstock & Davis is also the surveyor for the developer. <br />(This began prior to Council's request that they not handle <br />private business that requires city approval.) Either way, <br />all you need to do is say yes or no to the extension. The <br />vacation of easements will be considered at your March 22nd meeting. <br />ITEM 8. Borgen trained dog will be examined by our obedience <br />instructor, Doris Dechene. I received a call from local kennel <br />objecting to permit, because dog is attack trained. Also critical <br />of dog owner who apparently has been blacklisted by several kennel/ <br />schools. Apartment building owner will not allow dog to be off <br />leash on the apartment property. Owner now works the dog in our <br />park. <br />ITEM 9. Miller special use permit for indoor tennis courts. <br />Report attached. <br />ITEM 10. Mermaid development agreement. Report attached. <br />ITEM 11. PACT program lease apparently is satisfactory. School <br />Board will act on it the same night Council does. <br />ITEM 12. Midwest Planning has agreed to contract, except 15 <br />mileage. However, they will not argue over it if Council presses. <br />They submitted list of staff who will be working for us, and rates. <br />ITEM 13. Comer antenna lease apparently is satisfactory. He will <br />be present at meeting. <br />ITEM 14. Council wanted to adopt the Comprehensive Plan and add <br />the revisions later. These should be ready within a short time. <br />ITEM 15. Reiterates Council's concern that revenue sharing be <br />reenacted. Congressman Karth specifically requested this to aid <br />in support of such legislation. <br />ITEM 16. Extension of CETA Title VI would continue federal funding <br />for our four positions. Fifty -five chance that Congress will approve. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.