Laserfiche WebLink
-3- <br />Mayor Johnson recessed the regular meeting and called to order <br />the public hearing on Roger Baumgartner's (7585 Knollwood) <br />request for trained dog permit. Adm. Achen stated the four -year <br />old Labrador for which the permit is requested had been examined <br />by Doris Dechene, training instructor, who had found the dog <br />overall acceptably trained. Mayor Johnson asked if anyone wished <br />to speak for or against the permit. <br />Robert Waste, 2345 County Rd. H -2, asked what exactly the permit <br />is for. Is it a kennel? Is it to train dogs? <br />Mayor Johnson explained the dog leash law -- dog cannot be <br />off leash unless trained and you have a special permit. To <br />receive special permit, dog has to be examined by person schooled <br />in dog obedience. Councilman Shelquist added that off leash <br />is only when it is exercised, not running loose. Mayor Johnson <br />also added that the dog cannot be loose on public propery, <br />such as parks. <br />MSP (Pickar- Hodges) to approve the trained dog permit request <br />of Roger Baumgartner, 7585 Knollwood. 4 ayes <br />Baumgartner - 1 abstain <br />Mayor Johnson adjourned the public hearing and called <br />the regular Council meeting back to order. <br />WHITE OAK ESTATES THIRD ADDITION. Adm. Achen stated that prior <br />to approval of the resolution approving the final plat of <br />White Oak Estates Third Addition, Council should take action <br />on the development contract, copy of which the developer has <br />received. <br />Attorney Meyers stated that one of the developers had questioned <br />him about paragraph 3 of the development contract which states <br />that all improvements required shall be constructed and paid for <br />by the subdivider, and the Attorney explained that all public <br />utilities have been installed. The developer had also questioned <br />him about paragraph 15 of the contract regarding the necessity <br />of a $5,500 cash bond. The Attorney explained that there is <br />some drainage work that has to be done with the installation of <br />culvert and swale and cost of this is covered by the bond. If <br />the developer, for some reason, doesn't complete the project, <br />the City can use the monies for finishing the project. The developer <br />had indicated to Atty. Meyers that he would use a letter of credit, <br />which the Atty. said was satisfactory. <br />Atty. Meyers also stated the developer's objection to paragraph <br />16 of the contract, the terms "in the City Council's opinion ". <br />Atty. explained the purpose of the contract is to have a control <br />over the development, to be sure it is carried out in conformance <br />with Council's approval. <br />Atty. Meyers also stated the developer's question of whether or <br />not the costs (engineering, legal, etc.) in paragraph 20 of <br />the contract had not been included when he was assessed for <br />the cul -de -sac. Administrator Achen stated he had examined <br />