Laserfiche WebLink
-2- <br />MSP (Hodges - Baumgartner) to approve the Clara Ford Addition <br />as recommended by the Planning Commission referred to as <br />Exhibit A. <br />Mayor Johnson adjourned the public hearing and called the <br />regular Council meeting back to order. <br />Attorney Gerald Frisch, 2350 W. Seventh St., St. Paul, repre- <br />senting Mounds View Square Shopping Center, asked permission <br />for the proceedings to be transcribed by a court reporter. <br />Mayor Johnson replied that it is not the policy of the Council <br />to allow tape recording devices in the Council Chambers. Such <br />devices are deemed to be disruptive to the Council's delibera- <br />tions. The Council has a recording secretary, and the minutes <br />are available to all parties interested. Mr. Frisch stated <br />that he proposed to have a court reporter present or he would <br />object to being heard on it. The Mayor told him that they <br />would not allow a court report to be present. Mr. Frisch <br />stated that they would not appear in this regard then -- they <br />will take it by deposition. He wanted his objection noted <br />in the minutes. <br />4 ayes <br />Mayor Johnson recessed the regular meeting and called to order <br />at 8:30 p.m. the public hearing on Public Improvement Project <br />1975 -4A. Admin. Achen stated that this improvement began <br />last year as a result of the floods on the property around <br />Mounds View Square Shopping Center. To solve the immediate <br />drainage problem in that area, an emergency improvement under <br />authority of MN Statutes 429 was begun. The ditch was recon- <br />structed and the culverts were lowered in the driveway accesses <br />and under Long Lake Rd. Ramsey County did some ditch recon- <br />struction work on County Rd. I also. The owners realigned <br />their roof so the water flowed off the east side of the building. <br />Some asphalt berming was put around the culvert at the Co. Rd. I <br />access. The project was not completed because of the early <br />snow last year. <br />The property owner originally stated that he would do the <br />project, but then requested that the city do the job. <br />Driveways still have to be resurfaced and the ditch banks <br />stabilized to prevent erosion. This spring the city engineer <br />evaluated what had to be done, but the construction company <br />who was to do it went bankrupt. The Council called for this <br />public hearing, for specifications to be prepared, and bids to <br />be received. The city has received an informal report from <br />Banister and Short regarding the proposed comprehensive storm <br />water management plan. They want to drain this property <br />northwest rather than southeast, using a storm sewer line. <br />Their recommendation was to not encase the ditch unless the <br />highway department absolutely requires it. At such time as <br />the storm sewer line is installed, it may be possible to remove <br />the holding ponds that are at the shopping center now. The <br />staff and the city engineer recommend that the project be <br />reduced in scope to the extent of eliminating the piping. This <br />was discussed with the highway department, which tentatively <br />agrees. <br />