Laserfiche WebLink
June 14, 1976 Page 3 <br />Excavator - NEW Sewer & Water - NEW <br />Stan Nelson Excavating <br />4051 Colfax Ave. N. <br />Minneapolis, MN 55412 <br />Raymond Perron Excavating <br />177 Cleveland Ave. S.E. <br />New Brighton, MN 55112 <br />Masonry - NEW Blacktopping - NEW <br />Edward C. Lutz <br />2325 Uplander N.W. <br />Anoka, MN 55303 <br />Peddler - RENEWAL <br />Fairfax Asphalt Inc. <br />6699 Ashton Ave. N.E. <br />Fridley, MN 55432 <br />Minneapolis Recreation Development - to sell candy house to house <br />c/o Allan E. Law <br />2747 Stevens Ave. S. <br />Minneapolis, MN 55408 <br />Proposed duration of license: 1976 <br />ITEM 10. Approve June 14, 1976, bills. <br />ITEM 12. Accept low bid of Computer Election Systems for purchase <br />of punchcard voting system. Authorize expenditure of $15,100 of <br />General Revenue Sharing monies to purchase this system including <br />38 self - contained voting booths, 2 precinct ballot counters, and <br />miscellaneous supplies. <br />ITEM 13. Appoint Charles J. Hubbard Public Works Director /Engineer <br />effective June 28, 1976, with an annual salary of $17,500. <br />ITEM 15. Adopt Resolution No. 741, A RESOLUTION LEVYING ASSESSMENTS <br />FOR CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO PROJECT 1973 -4 FOR SANITARY SEWER, <br />WATER, STORM WATER DRAINAGE AND STREET IMPROVEMENT OVER A FOURTEEN <br />YEAR PERIOD. This resolution formally certifies to Ramsey County <br />the new assessments on the Ackermann subdivision approved September <br />8, 1975. No public hearing is necessary, because owner executed <br />an agreement accepting these assessments as a condition of subdivision <br />approval by Council. <br />5 ayes <br />Item 2 was then discussed. The administrator stated that the <br />Planning Commission denied the request of Charles Hermann, 8360 <br />Long Lake Rd., and Councilman Shelquist asked if the subdivision <br />regulations have been followed. The administrator explained that <br />the applicant indicated that he is not willing to spend the money <br />for a preliminary plat and is uncertain as to whether he should <br />pursue the matter further. It is more of an appeal of the Planning <br />Commission's decision. The attorney was asked to check into it. <br />