My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
gr00090_000041_pg206
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
MNHistoricalSocietyFiles (CC Minutes page-by-page 1958-1981)
>
gr00090_000041
>
gr00090_000041_pg206
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2011 4:49:00 PM
Creation date
4/12/2011 10:08:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
July 12, 1976 Page 7 <br />It is to his advantage that he owned the property for 30 years. <br />John Brown, 7630 Greenfield, stated that there are too many people <br />living in the small area now. <br />Mr. Gustafson stated that the people who own the homes on Greenfield <br />have already put a fence up and the whole area is separated. <br />We would probably put trees in there. A duplex is no bigger than a <br />single family home. We would want more elderly people in there. We <br />need a place for them that is close to the shopping center, etc. <br />Mrs. McGuire stated that she opposes this because she has seen what <br />has happened with the apartment buildings across the street. On one <br />bus pickup I have seen 22 children and we have had problems. I have <br />to believe that this has something to do with the apartment dwellings. <br />I hesitate to believe that if you put up a double bungalow it will be <br />only for older people. <br />Diane Schwartz stated that children wait in her yard for the bus stop <br />and she is continually out there policing it. <br />Mrs. McGuire stated that you don't get this in private dwellings as <br />everyone knows everyone else. <br />Mr. McGuire said that most older people have their own homes. It is <br />not feasible that older people will move in there. <br />Mr. Brown stated that he did not want to discriminate as to who is <br />renting the building. They just want to be sure that the rest of the <br />homes are not devalued and don't overcrowd the block. <br />Mr. Gustafson stated that if we built single family homes, according <br />to the ordinance we can put one on each lot. If we put in single <br />family 4 bedroom homes, how many children do you have? In the bungalow <br />you would have less children. The children would probably be too small <br />to go to school. <br />Acting Mayor Hodges asked the Council for their opinions: <br />Councilman Pickar: The tough thing is the people who have lived there <br />a long time. I am opposed to it unless something could be worked <br />out that would be acceptable to the home owners. <br />Councilman Shelquist stated that he felt that you could not put in <br />single family residences and isolate them by putting in additional <br />multiple dwellings. Mr. Moss had a good idea in developing those <br />three lots in single family dwellings. I would vote to deny the R -2. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.