Laserfiche WebLink
September 13, 1976 Page 10 <br />Kennel licenses - residential - renewal (continued) <br />MR. $ MRS. HAROLD G. BRANDT <br />7931 Woodlawn Drive N.E. <br />NOR -DAN SCHNAUZER'S <br />2186 Lambert Avenue <br />Heating - new <br />NORTHERN HTG & AIR CONDITIONING <br />2149 - 161st Ave. N.W. <br />Anoka, MN 55303 <br />Heating - renewal <br />DENNY'S MOBILE HOME SERVICE <br />745 - llth Ave. N.W. <br />New Brighton, MN 55112 <br />General - new <br />LIFETIME ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />409 Washington Ave. S. <br />Hopkins, MN 55343 <br />METRO ALUMINUM SIDING CO. <br />5014 Shamrock Drive N.E. <br />Minneapolis, MN 55421 <br />General - renewal <br />E. T. HUGHES CONSTRUCTION <br />1/2 Battle Creek Road <br />St. Paul, MN 55119 <br />ITEM F. Approve September 13, 1976, bills. <br />MID CONTINENT MANAGEMENT REQUEST FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO ERECT TEMPORARY SIGN <br />ADVERTISING SANDS APARTMENTS. Ms. Sue Kaster, 439 East Skillman, Maplewood, <br />stated she is the property manager for Mid Continent Management who manage <br />the Sands for the owner. The Sands is a 90 unit luxury building, the <br />most expensive in Mounds View. They are facing a vacancy problem because <br />of the rent structure. They have managed the Sands since February and <br />have evicted a lot of people that were there so they have nine vacancies. <br />They want to place a sign on the Launching Pad property. They requested a <br />special use permit for this sign because the square footage of an 8'x10' <br />sign was too large for a temporary sign. It was in violation of the sign <br />code because the .Launching Pad property already has a sign there. Signs <br />have to be 350 feet apart. Ms. Kaster questioned how a temporary sign can <br />be temporary when there is no set time limit, the only limit is the 12 <br />square feet. She would like a permit for six months to a year. <br />Councilmember Hodges stated that he did not see anything wrong with the <br />temporary sign for three to four months. Ms. Kaster stated that there <br />would be no lights, just painted plywood. She would like to fill the <br />nine apartments and if it takes a year, then the sign is not doing any good. <br />The Planning Comm. recommended a denial based on the fact that it was <br />within 350 feet of another sign. This sign would be about 250 feet from <br />the Launching Pad sign. <br />Atty. Meyers stated the ordinance says you cannot authorize a permit for a <br />permanent sign within 350 feet of each other. Ms. Kaster explained that <br />by definition of construction this sign would be a permanent sign. Mayor <br />Pickar stated that the only solution would be to get on a property where <br />there is not a permanent sign already. <br />Councilmember Baumgartner stated this sign would be in violation of the <br />existing ordinance and if the Council allowed this sign then a week from <br />now the duplexes and fourplexes would want a sign up, too, and the Council <br />would have established a precedent. <br />