Laserfiche WebLink
September 27, 1976 Page 10 <br />time. It does not seem that everything has been agreen upon, such as the <br />additional parking spaces. Mr. Dahlmeier stated they would like a <br />variance on the number of parking spaces. Mayor Pickar stated that if <br />everything appeared completely in order, it could be a council decision, <br />but requiring a variance is different. <br />Councilmember Baumgartner stated there is a communications gap somewhere <br />which should be corrected. Councilmember Shelquist stated he felt it was <br />on the part of the staff. <br />Attorney Meyers stated that Mr. Singer must now apply for a variance so <br />they can be heard by the Planning Conuuission. Mr. Rose explained that <br />this matter came before the Council because the Planning Commission did <br />not recommend it back to themselves. Councilmember Shelquist stated that <br />they didn't recommend it back because they assumed it would be brought <br />back. <br />ROLAND MILLER PROPOSED INDOOR TENNIS COURT DEVELOPMENT 2828 HIGHWAY #10. <br />Councilmember Shelquist explained that this matter came up last fall or <br />spring and a building permit was approved. No further action has been <br />taken so about a month ago the administrator suggested we contact Mr. <br />Miller. The Administrator sent letters and got no response. The <br />Administrator then suggested the Council take action to rescind the <br />special use permit. <br />MS (Hodges - Shelquist) to rescind the conditional special use permit for <br />Roland Miller's proposed indoor tennis court development. <br />5 ayes <br />Councilmember Baumgartner asked if this would be rescinded as of now? <br />Councilmember Hodges stated yes. Engineer Hubbard explained that a <br />registered letter dated August 26 was sent and received by Mr. Miller. <br />Attorney Meyers stated one of the problems is that some people were <br />calling and wondering where the money was that they spent on memberships. 5 ayes <br />ORDINANCE NO. 253 AMENDING CHAPTER 43 ENTITLED MOBILE HOMES. <br />Attorney Meyers reviewed the proposed amendment which was prepared by the <br />Administrator. Mayor Pickar stated that earlier this evening the Council <br />was presented with a petition of 20 signatures objecting to these pro- <br />posed tiedowns. <br />Mark Haggerty stated that he is representing the three mobile homes in <br />Mounds View. He asked if this was in the final stages of adoption? <br />Attorney Meyers stated that it is prepared as a proposal and is not in <br />ordinance form. This matter could be tabled or continued. <br />Mr. Haggerty stated that there were several provisions they were concerned <br />about, but do not object to the intent of the Council. One of the major <br />concerns is that at this time the State is about to implement their own <br />section of codes and requirements so there may be some conflicts, especially <br />as to cost distribution. He has not seen anywhere else where the costs are <br />appropriated between the mobile home owner and the park owner. The mobile <br />park owner would not have an increase in value, but if the mobile home <br />owner installed his own ground support system he would have an increase in <br />