Laserfiche WebLink
December 13, 1075 Page <br />Stu Rothgeber, 5200 Greenfield, stated that they included those four <br />lots to the south because it's difficult to upgrade the zoning and if <br />they find a use for it they could go ahead. He stated that they do <br />not intend to put townhouses in there because they know this would <br />never work. Mr. Rothgeber stated that if this is going to be a big <br />problem the Council could delete those four lots from the request. <br />' \ttornev Meyers explained that the developers would have to bring in <br />glans and enter into a development contract. On the lots to the <br />north that are to be ovner- occupied, the developer would have to <br />plat those i ndi vi dually. ''r. Rothgeber stated that he understood <br />this. Attorney Meyers also explained that the Council could give <br />a conditional rezoning which could be conditioned on the developer <br />bringing in the plans within 90 days or it would revert back to the <br />original zoning. "?r. Gustafson stated that the Planning Commission <br />suggested they be given six months. <br />Mayor Pickar asked for comments from the residents. <br />Gary Sward, 7544 Greenfield, stated that no one talked to him about <br />this development proposal. <br />John Brown, 7530 Greenfield, stated that he was not contacted either. <br />He stated that he did not like the idea of having 0 townhouses just <br />behind his house on four lots. <br />Gary Sward stated that the ' 1c0uires, who live on the south end, are <br />ill tonight and couldn't come but they have not been contacted either. <br />Mr. Rothgeber stated that they were here tonight because of a petition <br />whi ch was signed by 5P°! of the abutting 1 and owners. <br />Attorney Meyers explained that they were here on a request to rezone <br />and they needed a petition to qualify for the hearing. <br />'Admi n i strator AAchen read the petition. <br />Helen Houle, 7543 Edgewood, stated that they were contacted, but <br />they were told the proposal was for two - three unit buildings, or <br />six units. She stated that she did not sign the petition. <br />Councilmember Baumgartner asked if the people that signed the petition <br />were aware that the request was now for nine units instead of six. <br />Mr. Rothgeber asked if this really mattered. Councilmeniber Baumgartner <br />stated that if he had signed the petition it would natter to hiii. <br />'Administrator ;Achen reviewed the people that signed the petition. <br />There were 5O% of the adjoining property owners that signed the <br />petition so it did meet the ordinance requirements. This petition <br />allows this Hatter to be considered within 6 months of when the <br />rezoning was originally denied. <br />Mayor Pickar stated that since the wording of the petition has been <br />changed he did not know if this was even a legal hearing. Attorney <br />eyers explained that the petition granted then the right to have a <br />hearing and the Council Ghoul d have to decide on the wei ght they <br />