My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
gr00090_000043_pg032
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
MNHistoricalSocietyFiles (CC Minutes page-by-page 1958-1981)
>
gr00090_000043
>
gr00090_000043_pg032
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2011 5:16:46 PM
Creation date
4/12/2011 10:19:45 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
February 14, 1977 <br />Page 2 <br />Ms. Frankee stated that this has happened three tines and three <br />different plumbers have said that the pipes were too small to serve <br />a building of that size. She stated that the plugged pipe was on the <br />apartment property. <br />Councilmember Baumgartner stated that those apartments were built 8 or <br />11 years ago and at that time the sewer lines were sized to the units <br />in that building. The sewer system had to have been inspected by the <br />City and must have net the requirements. <br />Attorney Meyers stated that he would like to see a report from the <br />plumbing inspector. If this is a continuing problem the City should <br />look into it. <br />Mayor Pickar stated that the inspector would look into this. He <br />stated that the City is behind the people and he does not like <br />the idea that a owner would take retaliatory measures against a <br />tenant. <br />Jack Bell, an attorney representing Brentwood 9evelopment, stated <br />that there are easement problems with the land they platted in <br />Auditors Subdivision 89. 1r. Bell explained that he found a <br />resolution, but it didn't include the land described as it is now. <br />Attorney Meyers explained that he had asked Mr. Bell to come to <br />the meeting. Resolution 721 would have taken care of the problem <br />except that there has Leen a change in the status of the land. <br />Attorney Meyers stated that he had asked Ir. Bell to prepare a <br />resolution that would do the job. <br />Engineer Hubbard stated that he had reviewed this resolution and <br />there may be one problem because it includes Lot 7, Block 2 which <br />is across the street. <br />Mr. Bell stated that it should be Lot 7, Block 1, but the easements <br />are in Block 2. Title Insurance is saying that they have to get rid <br />of the easements through the City or court. <br />Attorney Meyers stated that the Council could approve the resolution <br />conditionally subject to the Engineer checking it out further. If <br />the resolution is alright then the City can release it. <br />Mr. Bell stated that he had also prepared some quit claim deeds to <br />the various owners. <br />MSP (Pickar-Ziebarth) to approve Resolution 306 and authorize the <br />Mayor and Administrator Clark to execute appropriate quit claim deeds <br />subject to approval of the City Engineer and Staff that this resolution <br />involves the same property as covered in Resolution 721. <br />Administrator stated that Mr. Bell had indicated that there were a <br />number of other easements and dedications that should be vacated. <br />Mr. Bell explained that there are easements of record other than <br />these that the County suggested be removed but these are the main <br />ones and the ones the title examiner objected to. <br />4 ayes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.