My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
gr00090_000043_pg037
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
MNHistoricalSocietyFiles (CC Minutes page-by-page 1958-1981)
>
gr00090_000043
>
gr00090_000043_pg037
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2011 5:17:37 PM
Creation date
4/12/2011 10:20:03 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
February 14, 1977 Page 7 <br />Mayor Pickar stated that there were several questions he had on the <br />development of this project. Mayor Pickar stated that the proposed <br />multiple dwellings in the rear of the property would need rezoning. <br />If the City were to change the zoning there may be questions as to <br />what will go along with it. <br />Mr. Byam stated that this is not a good time to build apartments. <br />They feel the fact that this would remain multiple would allow them <br />to develop all the property sooner. The apartment construction <br />situation should change sooner or later. <br />Mayor Pickar stated that he woul d give ful 1 go ahead for the City's <br />assistance on the cross over. <br />Councilmember Baumgartner stated that he felt the development plan <br />was put together very nice and a lot of tine and research went into <br />it. Councilmember Baumgartner stated that he wouldn't have any <br />problems with the City's cooperation with getting the cut on <br />Highway 10, but he did have some reservations on the multiple at <br />the north end of the property. <br />Councilmember Rowley stated that she was also impressed with the <br />presentation. She stated that she has reservations with the multiple <br />but would go along with the road cut. Counci lmenber Rowley stated that <br />she would like to see this report given to the major land owners near <br />this property. They may have some interest in this road cut too and <br />their support would help. <br />Councilmember Ziebarth stated that he was impressed because they <br />looked at the comprehensive plan before drawing up their plans. <br />He stated that his concern was the traffic problem and he would be <br />looking at that and the problems that would be created with this <br />interchange. <br />Stelios Aslanidis, a consultant for Pinecrest Properties, stated that <br />there was no way to develop the north west quadrant of the intersection <br />the way the comprehensive plan is suggesting in terms of accomodating <br />the traffic, without the cut. He stated that the plat maps do not <br />show an easement directly across from the south side of the Pinecrest <br />Properties that they can line up with. Mr. Aslanidis stated that this <br />proposal doesn't disrupt any existing uses. <br />Councilmember Ziebarth stated that he would be concerned if this were <br />to become a full intersection rather than a "t" intersection. He stated <br />that he did not want to see another problem like the one with County <br />Road H2 and Highway 10. <br />Administrator Achen explained that the plat maps have not been updated <br />yet but there is a section of the street that is platted directly <br />across from Raymond. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.