Laserfiche WebLink
March 14, 1977 Page 3 <br />EXCAVATING - new <br />Floyd Hoskins Construction Co. <br />620 - 123rd Ave. N.W. <br />Coon Rapids 55433 <br />AMUSEMENT DEVICES - new <br />National Amusement Company - for six general devices at <br />6501 Cambridge St. the Mounds View Square <br />Minneapolis 55416 Shopping Center <br />APPOINTMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION MEMBERS <br />Mayor Pickar stated that at the beginning of this year when <br />commission appointments were made, Council erroneously left off <br />the name of Dwight Kasperbauer as a member of the Human Rights <br />Commission. Four of the 7 positions were filled at the beginning <br />of the year. Since that time, the Commission has been trying <br />to fill the vacant positions with senior citizens and some high <br />school students. The Commission is in the process of apportioning <br />some money to needy senior citizens for energy conservation in <br />their homes and hopes to use students and senior citizens to <br />find people who need it the most. We now have more applicants for <br />the vacant positions than vacancies. <br />MSP ( Pickar- Hodges) to appoint Dwight Kasperbauer 8345 Sunnyside <br />Rd., Andrea Turner 3048 Bronson Drive, and Floyd Linnell 5205 <br />Sunnyside Rd. as permanent members of the Human Rights Commission <br />and to appoint Gloria Westberg 7906 Greenfield Ave., Louise <br />Nerdahl 7941 Edgewood Dr., and Felicia Linnell 5205 Sunnyside <br />Rd. as alternates to the Human Rights Commission. <br />SALE OF EXCESS TAKING FROM PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1973 -4 <br />Admin. Achen stated that proposals for purchase of the land were <br />received from 9 individuals or firms for Lot A, the smaller parcel <br />on Greenwood Drive, and 8 for Lot B, the larger parcel on Fairchild <br />Drive. The City's advertisement for the sale indicated we favored <br />a proposal with payment in full of the special assessments, which <br />are about $12,793 on Lot B and $32,184 on Lot B. Most offers are <br />cash; some propose to assume the assessments. The high proposer <br />is the same on both lots. The per lot bid on Parcel A is quite <br />high. Parcel B did not come in as high, possibly because of <br />concern with the cost of future subdivision of the land. <br />Admin. Achen stated that the proposals have not been made public <br />as of meeting time, reason being that if Council doesn't wish to <br />accept any of the bids, Council may wish to keep it confidential; <br />thus if the parcels are put out on bids at a future time, bidders <br />would_enot; have to be concerned with beating the offers presented <br />tonight. <br />5 ayes <br />