Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Baumgartner Questioned if the Comprehensive Drain Plan says that a <br />27" pipe is at capacity now. <br />Engineer Hubbard stated that the plan says it is inadequate for a three year statement <br />at full development, but that it is not a study that is relative to now. <br />Administrator Achen stated that bid opening dates needed to be set, but that in order <br />to have bids by June 8, in time for the Council to review them by the June 13 Council <br />meeting, the notices would have to go to the newspaper the next day, which would not <br />allow the Engineer ample time to solve the problem of drainage. Engineer Hubbard <br />felt the notices should go to the paper as soon as possible, and should. be published <br />twice. <br />MSP (Pickar - Hodges) to to conditionally accept final plans and specifications for the <br />Bona Road extension, and that Administrator Achen be authorized to advertise for bids <br />upon the builder meeting the conditions of coming to an agreement in accordance with <br />the City Engineer relative to solving water problems, if any, for the Bona Road <br />extension. 5 ayes <br />MSP (Pickar- Ziebarth) to hold a special meeting to consider the Bona Road extension <br />on Monday, June 20 at 7:30 PM, and for the bids to be opened at 11:00 AM on <br />Thursday, June 16. 5 ayes <br />RELEASE OF TAX FORFEITED LANDS - RESOLUTION #830 <br />Administrator Achen reported that the resolution declares tax forfeited parcels on <br />the west side of Bona Road extended to be non - conservation lands as far as the City <br />is concerned, and that this action would allow public sale of the parcels and hope- <br />fully their development and return to the tax rolls. <br />MSP (Hodges- Rowley) to approve Resolution #830, the release of tax forfeited lands. 5 ayes. <br />NEW TRUNK HIGHWAY 10 CONSTRUCTION - RESOLUTION 1831 <br />Administrator Achen reported that the resolution responds to Planning Commission <br />recommendation that Council reaffirm its support of the existing residential <br />character of Red Oak Drive north of existing TH 10, and urges completion of new <br />TH 10, and asks for further study of traffic impacts of various interchange <br />a, evnw . r ids arid requests ^ L r T :. aid in iJtAlaiTg temporary relief to County <br />Read <br />J congestion. <br />Jim Bergstrom, 8400 Red. Oak Drive expressed. concern. that the statement n iie in +he <br />resolution was not strong enough in discouraging an interchange at Red Oak Drive. <br />He felt that a very definite and strong statement should be made, inT•orming the <br />DOT exactly that the citizens and Council did not want the Red Oak interchange. <br />Mr. Bergstrom also mentioned that he had been told by reliable authorities that <br />trucking firms from Roseville intend to build in the new industrial park in Spring <br />Lake Park and consequently if the Red Oak interchange was put in, there would be <br />heavy trucking traffic in the neighborhood. <br />Mayor Pickar stated that he felt the resolution said the same thing the Citizen's <br />Group was trying to say, but just in different words. Mr. Bergstrom again stated <br />he wanted a stronger statement, but if the Council did feel they were saying the <br />same thing as he wanted, then he would go along with then. <br />Councilmember Baumgartner stated that until he had examined other alternatives, he <br />did not feel he could nake a stronger statement than what was already in the resolu- <br />tion. <br />