My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
gr00090_000047_pg186
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
MNHistoricalSocietyFiles (CC Minutes page-by-page 1958-1981)
>
gr00090_000047
>
gr00090_000047_pg186
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2011 6:25:19 PM
Creation date
4/12/2011 10:46:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
July 10, 1978 <br />MSP (Rowley - Ziebarth) to approve Resolution #905. <br />Councilmember Ziebarth asked if a petition had been received from the gentleman <br />who had made the request at the previous Council meeting, as he had said he <br />would circulate a petition in the neighborhood. Councilmember Rowley replied <br />that the gentleman's name was Ron Kritzik, 2512 County Road H2, and that Staff <br />could contact him to see if he had a petition. <br />Mayor Pickar recessed the regular meeting and opened the next public hearing. <br />Page 5 <br />5 ayes <br />PROJECT 1978 -5 and 1978 -5A - DRAINAGE MOUNDS VIEW SQUARE & EDGEWOOD DRIVE EXTENSION <br />Engineer Hubbard reported that the hearing was for two projects, 1978-5 for the <br />extension of Edgewood from County Road I to Hillview, and 1978 -5A, for storm <br />sewer on Edgewood. <br />Engineer Hubbard outlined three alternatives for the projects, with Alternative <br />#1 estimated to cost $180,250, Alternative #2 estimated to cost $116,500 and <br />Alternative #3 estimated to cost $230,850. Engineer Hubbard explained the proposed <br />assessments would range from 2.2 per square foot to 9.4 per square foot, depending <br />upon the alternative selected, and that the street improvements for extending <br />Edgewood would be elegible for 100% funding from State aid. Engineer Hubbard added <br />that the area of benefit would be that area which would drain into the proposed <br />storm sewer. <br />Mr. Smith, 5567 St. Stephans stated that the Blaine sewer runs through his back <br />yard. Engineer Hubbard explained that it was a sanitary sewer, not a storm sewer. <br />Mr. Lynn stated that the residents of the area do not want the project. Engineer <br />Hubbard replied that their water is running somewhere and must be taken care of, <br />and thus, they would be benefitted. He added that provisions would most likely <br />be made for the handicapped and elderly. <br />Charles Mectil, 5533 St. Michael Street stated he already had a storm sewer system. <br />Engineer Hubbard replied that that system was inadequate for every a three year storm. <br />Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, stated that some concerned citizens had <br />taken a survey of 159 homes and asked four questions regarding the project, of <br />which two homes were in favor of the project and 26 wanted more information. Mr. <br />McCarty stated that it was his belief from previous statements made by the Council - <br />members and Mayor that they would vote for what the citizens wanted, and that he <br />felt they should turn down Projects 1978-5 and 1978-5A. <br />Fred Batey, 2316 Hillview stated that he had received a notice of the public hearing <br />and spoken to the City Engineer and felt there were several inconsistencies with <br />the project. He stated that he did not feel Mounds View citizens should complain <br />about their water problems, when compared to cities such as Rochester and Minneapolis <br />who had had considerable problems. <br />Neil Loeding, 5046 Longview Drive asked if 1978 -5A had been petitioned for. Mayor <br />Pickar replied that it had been added at the request of residents who had water <br />problems. <br />Mr. Loeding stated that in the August 8, 1977 minutes Mr. Harstad stated that he <br />agreed to be assessed for six lots and asked whether the property owners would <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.