My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
gr00090_000050_pg102
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
MNHistoricalSocietyFiles (CC Minutes page-by-page 1958-1981)
>
gr00090_000050
>
gr00090_000050_pg102
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2011 7:04:01 PM
Creation date
4/12/2011 11:01:03 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
April 23, 1979 Page 5 <br />anything over that. She also stated that she had a real problem with <br />having a building on an easement and with an uneven lot split. <br />MSD (Rowley - Ziebarth) to approve an equal lot split with the accessory <br />building size reduced to conform to code, that when it is reduced, the <br />garage door will be removed so in appearance it will be an accessory <br />building and not a garage, and the building be no closer than the <br />allowable setback, maintaining the 5' rear yard setback and the 5' <br />easement be maintained, and the chicken coup to be removed. <br />A rollcall vote was taken: <br />Councilmember Ziebarth - aye <br />Councilmember Hodges - nay <br />Councilmember Forslund - nay <br />Councilmember Rowley - aye <br />Mayor McCarty - nay <br />3 nays, <br />2 ayes <br />Councilmember Ziebarth stated that he felt an uneven lot split could <br />create problems in the future. He added that the garage as it is now <br />presents no problems unless the owner wants to subdivide, which he <br />has requested now, so he should be required to meet code. <br />Official Rose pointed out that the applicant will be in violation when <br />he comes in for a building permit if the proposed home has a double <br />garage. <br />Jerry Linke, 2219 Knoll Drive stated that a precedence has been set on <br />the block for equal lot splits and that if the applicant was required <br />to take out the large garage door, he could just as easily continue on <br />and cut it down to size on that end and meet code. <br />MSP (McCarty - Ziebarth) to reconsider the previous motion. 5 ayes <br />MSP (McCarty- Rowley) to have an equal lot split, with the building being <br />reduced to conform to code, the garage door be removed, the chicken <br />coup be removed, and the 5' easements be maintained. <br />A rollcall vote was taken: <br />Councilmember Ziebarth - aye <br />Councilmember Hodges - aye <br />Councilmember Forslund - nay <br />Councilmember Rowley - aye <br />Mayor McCarty - aye <br />4 ayes, <br />1 nay <br />PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR KREMER PROPERTY - COUNTY ROAD I, AND SILVER LAKE RD. <br />Mr. Kremer explained that his parents own two lots which they would like <br />to develop, and which require services, and presented their proposed plan. <br />Official Rose explained that services for the lots would be determined <br />at the time the building permit was issued for the proposed duplexes, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.