My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
gr00090_000053_pg114
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
MNHistoricalSocietyFiles (CC Minutes page-by-page 1958-1981)
>
gr00090_000053
>
gr00090_000053_pg114
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2011 7:42:14 PM
Creation date
4/12/2011 11:16:55 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL <br />Page 2 <br />Regular Meeting <br />April 14, 1980 <br />Mr. Loeding raised the issue of Council <br />representation to TRA. The Mayor noted <br />that the residents involved in the process <br />at that time were not certain they wanted <br />to be officially involved because they were <br />not sure what their level of input would be. <br />As it turned out, people did go voluntarily. <br />The Council, however, did not formally or <br />informally send any representatives. <br />Mr.Loeding raised another issue regarding <br />the availability of the minutes for the <br />public to peruse. After much discussion, <br />the Mayor stated the council minutes would <br />be available to the public the Friday before <br />the regular Council meeting. This would allow <br />the weekend for perusal and study. The entire <br />Council supported the Mayor's statement. <br />Councilmember Rowley made a motion to defer <br />the reports of agenda item #5 until later <br />in the meeting and to go on to agenda item #6. <br />Tom Zumbwald, architect for the project, <br />reviewed the building and site layout with <br />the Council. Councilmember Ziebarth questioned <br />him regarding the provisions for handicapped <br />entrance to the building. Zumbwald responded <br />that parking areas, access to the building (1st <br />floor), and the bathroom facilities were all <br />in compliance. The 2nd floor would not be <br />accessible, but because of the function of that <br />floor (administrative offices), this should not <br />present a problem. According to regulations, no <br />elevator is required unless the building has <br />100 occupants. <br />5. RESIDENTS TO BE HEARD FROM <br />THE FLOOR <br />NEIL LOEDING <br />5046 LONGVIEW DRIVE <br />AGENDA ITEM #5 <br />6.. DEFERRED UNTIL LATER IN THE MEETING <br />7. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL -WOLF & ASSOC. <br />Resolution 1101- Resolution Setting <br />Guidelines for the Issuance of <br />Tax Exempt Industrial Development <br />Bonds or Loans by the City. <br />The City Attorney pointed out that this proposal <br />was two -fold: 1)The approval of the development <br />proposal, 2) The approval of the tax - exempt financing. <br />The Mayor stated he would like to resolve the IRB <br />matter first to have some type of guidelines available <br />for this proposal. This 'should be available when <br />the Wolf and Associate proposal will again be addressed <br />at the May 4th meeting. It will be the first agenda <br />item scheduled to begin at 7:00 P.M. The Mayor <br />asked that representatives from Wolf and Associates <br />be available and they responded that they would. <br />(If there is going to be a public hearing, it will <br />probably be scheduled for May 27th). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.