My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
gr00090_000054_pg224
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
MNHistoricalSocietyFiles (CC Minutes page-by-page 1958-1981)
>
gr00090_000054
>
gr00090_000054_pg224
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2011 7:56:50 PM
Creation date
4/12/2011 11:23:21 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting <br />Page 4 August. 11, 1980 <br />Mr. Thayer, 7400 Silver Lake Road, stated <br />he agreed to deny the rezoning to I-1. <br />Public hearing closed at 8:10 P.M. <br />The regular meeting re-opened at 8:10 P.M. <br />Mayor McCarty noted that the Planning Commission <br />had reaffirmed this area as low density residential <br />and that it would be creating a substandard industrial <br />lot constituting spot zoning if it were changed to an I-1. <br />MOTION: Ziebarth made a motion, seconded by Hodges, <br />to deny the request of the existing R-1 to I-1 industrial <br />at 7288 Silver Lake Road because of the effect on the public's <br />health, safety, and welfare. Council further deems that there <br />would be an increase in traffic of a kind that could constitute <br />public nuisance. The proposed rezoning and use could also affect <br />the property values of the abutting properties. <br />Ayes-4 <br />Nay s-0 <br />MOTION CARRIES (MOTION CARRIES) <br />Mr. Lee Smith asked the Council what use this property <br />could have within the R-1 zoning. Mayor McCarty <br />responded that the Council was not in a position to <br />recommend land uses other than R-1 in an R-1 district. <br />Mr. Jim Wyatt asked the Council that since he could <br />not continue to improve the land for usage as a repair <br />shop, that he could leave the land as it was right now? <br />Official Rose reminded Mr. Wyatt that some improvements <br />made by him on this property had continued against his <br />(Official Rose) recommendations. Pending discussion with <br />the city attorney, the City may be notifying him (Mr. Wyatt) <br />that he had to remove one of the driveways. The Mayor <br />interjected at this point that it was the responsibility of <br />citizens to check compliance with City code's before doing <br />any improvements/remodeling. A decision on Mr. Wyatt's <br />property improvements could not be made until an inspection <br />occurred by the City. <br />Official Rose recapped the following for the <br />Council regarding Bayport Acres Rezoning issue: <br />A public hearing was held on May 12th. Based upon <br />a motion which approved the preliminary plat and <br />rezoning contingent upon approval of the final plat <br />(with the requirements that Council placed on it), <br />the final plat was approved at the July 28th City <br />Council meeting. <br />10. <br />BAYPORT ACRES- <br />REZONING R-1 to <br />R-2 <br />(Ordinance 296) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.