My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
gr00090_000057_pg270
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
MNHistoricalSocietyFiles (CC Minutes page-by-page 1958-1981)
>
gr00090_000057
>
gr00090_000057_pg270
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2011 8:47:43 PM
Creation date
4/12/2011 11:44:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 28, 1981 <br />Regular Meeting Page Five <br />here was considerable discussion regarding the <br />proposed agreement versus Ordinance 305 and what <br />course of action should be taken. Mayor McCarty <br />stated that he wanted enough time to insure that <br />they were going in the correct direction. He <br />stated he would contact Attorney Meyers as soon <br />as he returned, and would then get in touch with. <br />Mr. Poppelaars. He also thanked Mr. Poppelaars <br />for his patience. <br />Motion /Second: McCarty /Hodges to table the <br />drainage agreement for the property owners around <br />Wetland I -9. <br />4 ayes 0 nays <br />Motion /Second: McCarty /Forslund to remove <br />from the table consideration of Resolution <br />No. 1358. <br />4 ayes 0 nays <br />Motion /Second: McCarty /Hodges to approve <br />Resolution No. 1358 and forward the specialized <br />plans to the Net Council for the Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br />4 ayes 0 nays <br />Finance Director Brager explained that the <br />proposed resolution covers the utility bills <br />on which all normal methods of collection have <br />been exhausted. He stated that levying a tax <br />would be the least costly method of collecting <br />the delinquent utility charges. <br />Mayor McCarty expressed concern that some of <br />the bills might be for elderly or handicapped <br />people, on whom it presented a hardship to pay. <br />Finance Director Brager explained that the <br />County would be contacting each individual and <br />wing them 30 days to pay, or appeal, and would <br />ind out at that time if there were extenuating <br />circumstances. <br />Attorney Karney stated that the proposed reso- <br />lution would be the best and most economical <br />Motion Carried <br />11. Consideration of Rslt. <br />No. 1358 Forwarding <br />Specialized Plans <br />Including Waste Water <br />Flow Forecasts, Inter - <br />Community Service, Pro- <br />posed Trunk Sewers, <br />Timing of Development <br />and Wetland Area <br />Moratorium <br />Motion Carried <br />Motion Carried <br />12. Consideration of Rslt. <br />No. 1366 Levying a Tax <br />for Delinquent Utility <br />Charges Over 4 One <br />Year Period <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.