1998 Planning Commission Packets

Home Browse Search

. 1. '.:. .. _ _ ._ . ... f: . i . . ; . . ' _� � __ - _ '._.f.'.�.`�_' �. _ �:<s:_._..' "' _ '_"___'_'. . � � — " _ ._ . ., c. . . . _ . . i_ k _ _ _. � � - ....:.i � � �n�-, � —. . � .. � .. _ a .--� _�..�. _.��.___ _" . _ —. —_-- (: �: REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Meeting Date: Stafi Report by: Planning Case No: Request: Petitioner: Location: PIN Noo Zoning/ Land Use: February 18, 1998 James Ericson, Planning Associate 512-98 Approval of a revised development review to a11ow for the expansion of the Saturn dealership Saturn Development Company, represented by Jim Price 2375 and 2395 Highway 10 OS-30-23-31-0001, 2, 3 B-3, Highway Business Commercial / Saturn Auto Dealership Applicable Regulations: Section 1006.06, entitled "Development Controls," requires that all proposed industrial, commercial and residential developments and expansions of existing facilities ... must be reviewed by the Planning Commission and approved by the City Council. Attachments: Ramsey County Request for Combination, dared 2/5/98 Revised Site Plan, dated 2/12/98 (Separate Attachment) Revised Photometric Analysis, dated 1/30/98 (Separate Attachment) Planning Commission Resolution No. 535-98 Background: On February 4, 1998, the Planning Commission discussed the proposal to revise the site plans for the Saturn auto dealership which were originally approved in 1996. The plans were to expand their operation by adding showroom space, service bays and a car wash. The difference between the 1996 expansion (not implemented) and the 1998 expansion is that the majority of the expansion would be to the east of the e�cisting structure, with the exception of the car wash. One additional service bay and increased showroom floor area account for the increased building area from the 1996 approved plans. Because of issues raised during the 1996 approval process, residents within 350 feet of the Saturn property were notified of this meeting. Analysis As was discussed at the last meeting, the primary issues with this development proposal concern availability of parking, site lighting and the possibility that Rice Creek Watershed District might require on-site stonnwater storage. The applicant was directed to produce a more detailed photometric analysis to ensure that glare and light spillage are within City Code requirements, provide documentation from Ramsey County indicating that the three lots are joined together, and