Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Jim Ericson <br />Februsry �3, i998 <br />Page 2 <br />analysis section. Of the 145 trip ends ge�eraced by �Walgreen's, we calculate that 29 will be pass by <br />trips and the remaining 116 will be new trips. <br />In z��viewing the distributioz� and assignment of the newiy generated tra�c, we noted a error on the <br />bottom portion of Figure 3 of khe repart. At the T.�. 10 access af Walgreen's, the westbonnd right <br />turn movement is sho�wn as 144. This number should be 14. <br />Level of Service <br />With tkze chaage in the trip generation rate and the pass by percentage, the Walgreen's developanent <br />is ex�ected to inc�ease thc volume through the intezsection of T.H. 10 and County Road I by five <br />vehicles per cycle (oz� average) durzng the p.m. peak hour. This zs slighdy higher thac� ttle three <br />vehicles per hour stated in the $enshoof re�ort. <br />The net result is that ihere is a slight increase xn delay fior sozne of the movenaents and the <br />interseciion aw whole but xt does not change the overall 1��; �;l of service (L05), As stated in the <br />Benshoof report, the intersection wi11 operate ae an overcap��iry level (LOS F) and the addittiona�l <br />traffic is not expected to have a signifiea.nt iznpact on the o��<sration of the inrersection. <br />To vez�fy the imp�ied assumptior� that develogzneat was not dri�ing the overcapacity situation at the <br />intersection, we reviewed the level of service at Che intersectio� with 1997 background traffc oniy, <br />1998 batkgzound �c only and X999 background uaffie using an annual growthrate of 2.5 �ercent. <br />This ana��sis showed that the intersection would begin to opezate at an overcapacity level in 1999 <br />even without derrelopment due to the laz'ge northbound thxough movenaent on T.I�_ 10. A summazy <br />of this a.nalysis is attached. <br />We reviewed the pot�ntial o� adding capaciry (lanes� to tl�e County Road I approa�hes of the <br />intersection. Adding lanes at these approaches wquld not sign�ficantly improve [he level of service <br />at the inte�section. As noted in the Benshoof report, the T:H. 118/610 connector should help to <br />�.11eviate congestion at this intersection. We estimated that a 10 percent reduction im the T.H. 10 <br />through traffic would bri�ng the intersection out o�F an overcapaeiry situatiozi. <br />We also reviewed the storage capacity for the westbound Counry I approach. 'We estimate that <br />200 feet o� stora.ge for queued vehicles is needed. Since the Walgreen's access on Counry Road I <br />is located app�oximately 200 feet east of r1�e T.H. 10 i�ntersection, chere may be a few cycles in the <br />p.m. peak hour where the queue backs up to but not th�ough thc Walgreen's access. <br />Site Plan Review <br />We have reviewed the site plaa and noted a few items: <br />A place for trash collection is not shown and could not be evaluated. <br />The Coun�y Road I access to the site sho�vs the two lanes for outbound traffic as one <br />through and one share left-turn and through lane. The lanes for the ""I"' ic�tersection <br />should be designated as one left turn only lanc and one right turn only aane. <br />�:00�1 Si'�C f1CT7 fiR6 7TQ Vi7.7 4T'pT T?T.T 4R/PT/7n <br />